Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming, especially when faced with similar models. The Motorola Moto G71s and Moto G62 5G are both solid mid-range contenders, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G71s takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 695 chipset and 33W charging. However, the G62 5G boasts a brighter display and exceptional battery life, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious users prioritizing longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2022, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 20 | Available. Released 2022, June 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2440 pixels (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 122h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1571:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 303072 (v9)
GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G71s
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Likely better camera quality
- Slightly better display panel
- Potentially shorter battery life than G62
- May be slightly more expensive
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Exceptional Battery Life (122h endurance)
- Brighter Display (552 nits)
- More Affordable
- Good value for money
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 480+)
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Potentially lower camera quality
Display Comparison
The Moto G62 5G shines with its impressive 552 nits max brightness, making it easier to view outdoors. Both phones feature a 1571:1 contrast ratio, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The G71s likely has a slightly better panel, but the G62's brightness advantage is noticeable.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but details are lacking in the provided specs. Generally, the G71s is expected to have a slightly better main sensor and image processing due to its more powerful chipset. Both likely offer similar video recording capabilities.
Performance
Here, the Moto G71s clearly wins. The Snapdragon 695 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 480+, offering smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The G62 5G is adequate for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Moto G62 5G is the clear winner in this category. Its endurance rating of 122h is exceptional, suggesting it can easily last two days on a single charge. The G71s, while still offering decent battery life, won't match the G62 5G's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Moto G71s is ideal for users who prioritize performance and faster charging. The Moto G62 5G is a great choice for those seeking exceptional battery life, a vibrant display, and a more affordable price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Moto G71s is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset.
❓ How long will the Moto G62 5G's battery last?
The Moto G62 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting it can easily last two days on a single charge.
❓ Is the Moto G71s worth the extra cost?
If performance and faster charging are your priorities, the Moto G71s is worth the extra investment. Otherwise, the G62 5G offers excellent value with its exceptional battery life and bright display.