Motorola Moto G71 5G vs Moto G82: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G82 edges out the G71 5G thanks to its brighter display, potentially better camera performance, and exceptional battery life. While both share the same chipset, the G82's refinements make it the slightly superior choice for most users seeking a budget 5G experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G71 5G | Motorola Moto G82 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - PRC | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 19 | Available. Released 2022, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W / 33W wired, 50% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black | Meteorite Gray, White Lily |
| Models | XT2169-1, XT2169-2 | XT2225-1 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Slightly more compact design
- Good value for money
- Dimmer display
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Shorter battery life
Motorola Moto G82
- Brighter display (690 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (130h endurance)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Excellent contrast ratio (nominal)
- Slower charging (30W)
- Slightly larger size
- Nominal contrast ratio can be misleading
Display Comparison
The Moto G82 boasts a significant advantage with its measured 690 nits max brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. The G71 5G's display is adequate, but noticeably dimmer. The G82's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a marketing term and real-world performance may vary. Both likely use OLED panels, offering good color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', the G82 is generally expected to have a slightly better camera system due to potential software optimizations and possibly a slightly improved sensor. The G71 5G's camera is still capable, but the G82 likely offers better low-light performance and more detailed images. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance will be very similar in everyday tasks and gaming. Expect smooth multitasking and decent gaming performance at medium settings. Differences will likely be minimal and depend more on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 shines here with an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. This indicates significantly longer battery life than the G71 5G. While the G71 5G offers 30W/33W charging, the G82's 30W charging is still respectable, but the longer battery life means less frequent charging is needed.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G71 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more compact design. The Moto G82 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, long battery life, and potentially improved camera quality, even if it means slightly slower charging.