The Motorola Moto G67 Power and Samsung Galaxy A14 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal. The G67 Power prioritizes processing power with a modern Snapdragon chipset, while the A14 offers a choice of chipsets and leans on Samsung’s brand recognition and software ecosystem. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G67 Power emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over both versions of the Galaxy A14, coupled with faster 30W charging. While the A14 boasts Samsung’s software and potentially wider availability, the G67 Power delivers more bang for your buck.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 05 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 12 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1050 nits (peak) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, planned upgrade to Android 16 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Cilantro, Parachute Purple, Blue Curacao | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | ₹ 15,734 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G67 Power
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 7s Gen 2)
- Faster 30W charging
- More power-efficient chipset
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details lacking
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung’s One UI software
- Potentially lower price point
- Wider brand recognition
- Slower processor (Helio G80 or Exynos 850)
- Slower 15W charging
- Potentially less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. The Galaxy A14’s display specifications are not provided, but based on its market segment, it likely features a 6.6-inch PLS LCD panel. The Moto G67 Power’s display details are also missing, but we can assume a standard LCD panel. The key difference lies in potential software optimizations; Samsung’s displays generally offer better color calibration. However, without specific data on resolution, brightness (nits), and color gamut coverage, a definitive comparison is difficult. The lack of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on battery conservation over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to assess without detailed sensor information. The Galaxy A14 likely features a primary sensor around 50MP, typical for this price range, but details on aperture and sensor size are missing. The Moto G67 Power’s camera specs are also unavailable. However, the presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A14 is a red flag; these sensors rarely deliver usable images. Image processing will likely favor Samsung’s typically vibrant and saturated style, while Motorola tends towards a more natural look. Without specific details, it’s safe to assume both phones will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Motorola Moto G67 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Samsung Galaxy A14’s Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm) or Exynos 850 (8nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency and thermal management, translating to sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon’s CPU configuration – octa-core with 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a noticeable advantage over the Helio G80’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. The Exynos 850, while built on a smaller 8nm node, utilizes less powerful Cortex-A55 cores across the board, resulting in lower overall performance. This means the G67 Power will handle multitasking, gaming, and app loading significantly faster.
Battery Life
Both phones prioritize battery life, but approach it differently. The Moto G67 Power’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Galaxy A14’s 15W charging. Faster charging significantly reduces downtime, allowing for quicker top-ups. While battery capacity details are missing for both, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s superior efficiency in the G67 Power means it will likely deliver comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity than the A14. The faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G67 Power if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps, moderate gaming, and benefit from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who value performance and efficiency. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A14 if you prefer Samsung’s One UI software experience, prioritize a potentially lower price point (depending on the version), and don’t require top-tier processing power for intensive tasks. It’s a solid choice for basic smartphone functionality and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 chip in the Galaxy A14 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is less efficient than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) in the Moto G67 Power. This means the A14 is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming, leading to reduced performance and potentially discomfort.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Samsung Galaxy A14 actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones produce images with limited detail and sharpness. The small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization result in blurry and noisy photos. It's unlikely to deliver satisfying results for serious macro photography.
❓ Can the Motorola Moto G67 Power handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Moto G67 Power is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with reasonably smooth frame rates. However, sustained performance may vary depending on the device's thermal management. Expect to potentially adjust settings for optimal balance between visual quality and performance.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates and security patches over time?
Samsung generally provides longer software support for its devices compared to Motorola. While both brands offer updates, Samsung typically commits to more years of security patches and potentially even major Android version upgrades for the Galaxy A14.
