Moto G64 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: Which Budget 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and a more capable processor for demanding apps, the Motorola Moto G64 is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7025 chipset offers a noticeable advantage. However, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W charging is a game-changer for those who value minimizing downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G64 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 11 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 23 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 33 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | - | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | ₹ 13,499 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G64
- More powerful processor for better performance
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A78)
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Slower charging speed compared to the Nord CE 3 Lite
- Likely lacks OIS for improved image stabilization
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Incredibly fast 67W charging
- Quick top-up times for minimal downtime
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Less powerful processor compared to the Moto G64
- Older CPU architecture (Kryo 660)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits) are missing, both utilize 6nm chipsets suggesting a focus on efficiency over pushing display boundaries. Bezels are likely comparable given the price point. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, leaning towards vibrant rather than color-accurate for professional work. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a cost-saving measure.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will feature a primary sensor paired with depth and macro lenses (the usefulness of the latter is questionable). The aperture of the main sensor will be crucial; a wider aperture (lower f-number) on either device will result in better low-light performance. Image processing style will likely differ – Motorola tends towards more natural colors, while OnePlus often boosts saturation. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G64’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz – compared to the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a tangible performance advantage for the G64 in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both are 6nm, the Dimensity 7025’s architecture is more efficient. The Snapdragon 695 is known for its 5G capabilities, but the G64’s CPU advantage is more impactful for overall responsiveness. RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X on both) isn’t specified, but the chipset difference will be the dominant factor.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified, but the charging speeds are a major differentiator. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite’s 67W charging is significantly faster than the Moto G64’s 30W charging. OnePlus claims 80% charge in 30 minutes, while Motorola states 50% in 33 minutes. This means the Nord CE 3 Lite will offer a much quicker top-up, even if the G64 has a slightly larger battery. The impact is real-world: users who frequently need to recharge quickly will heavily favor the OnePlus.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G64 if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, moderate gaming, and future software updates without significant slowdown. It’s ideal for users who value long-term performance. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and don’t heavily rely on intensive applications. This phone is perfect for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.