Moto G64 vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip, while not a raw performance leader, excels in AI-driven tasks and image processing. However, the Moto G64 offers a strong value proposition for those seeking a capable daily driver with faster charging and a potentially smoother gaming experience at a lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G64 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 11 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 23 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 33 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 13,499 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Motorola Moto G64
- Faster charging with 30W support
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7025 chipset
- Less advanced camera system
- Potentially slower software updates
- Display likely less bright than Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Google Tensor G2 for AI and machine learning
- Guaranteed software updates and clean Android experience
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Higher price compared to Moto G64
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the Moto G64. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Pixel 7a’s higher peak brightness and Google’s color calibration will provide a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. The Moto G64’s display specs are less defined, suggesting a more budget-oriented panel.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is the clear winner in the camera department, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Tensor G2, are renowned for their dynamic range and detail. The Moto G64 will likely offer a competent camera for everyday snapshots, but it won’t match the Pixel 7a’s consistently high image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is built for machine learning and AI tasks, offering advantages in photography and voice recognition. Its CPU configuration (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1, 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a performance edge over the Moto G64’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm) which features (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). While the Dimensity 7025 is a capable chip, the Tensor G2’s more advanced architecture and dedicated AI cores give the Pixel 7a an advantage in complex tasks. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7025 may offer better efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life during moderate use.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting good battery life despite its 18W charging. The Moto G64 counters with 30W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3+, promising a 50% charge in just 33 minutes. While the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging, the Moto G64 lacks this feature. The faster wired charging of the Moto G64 is a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups, potentially offsetting any difference in overall battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G64 if you need a phone that prioritizes fast charging (30W) and a solid, efficient processor for everyday tasks and casual gaming. It’s ideal for users who want a reliable device without breaking the bank. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a superior camera system, a cleaner Android experience with guaranteed updates, and the benefits of Google’s AI-powered features, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed and paying a premium.