Motorola Moto G62 vs Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset, blazing-fast 67W charging, and brighter display. While the Moto G62 offers a decent experience, the X5 Pro's performance and charging speed provide a noticeable edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 (India) | Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 19 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.21 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 531398 (v9) GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 (India)
- Clean Android experience
- Slightly more compact design
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Faster Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Excellent value for money
- MIUI software (can be polarizing)
- Potentially larger size
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 912 nits peak brightness, making it much easier to view outdoors. Its contrast ratio, while nominally infinite, suggests excellent image quality. The Moto G62's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the X5 Pro. Both use AMOLED panels, offering rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Poco X5 Pro likely holds an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, due to the superior image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 778G. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs (sensor sizes, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison. Expect good results from both, but the X5 Pro has the potential for slightly better images.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G in the Poco X5 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G62. Expect noticeably smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the X5 Pro. The X5 Pro's CPU configuration (1x Cortex-A78 + 3x Cortex-A78) is also more powerful than the G62's.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113h, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 45 minutes, while the Moto G62's 15W charging is considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto G62 (India)? Users prioritizing a clean software experience and a slightly more compact design might find the G62 appealing. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro? Those seeking top-tier performance in this price range, incredibly fast charging, and a vibrant display will be better served by the Poco X5 Pro.