Moto G62 5G vs Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. While the Moto G62 5G offers respectable endurance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging and higher peak brightness provide a more convenient and visually appealing experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Longer battery endurance (122h)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Clean, near-stock Android experience
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 480+)
- Dimmer display (552 nits)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Much faster charging (67W)
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (115h)
- Potentially more bloatware
- Higher price (likely)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 746 nits compared to the Moto G62 5G’s 552 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While Xiaomi claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, this is a nominal value; the Moto G62 5G’s measured 1571:1 contrast ratio is a concrete figure, suggesting good black levels. The difference in brightness is the most noticeable distinction, impacting everyday usability for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but detailed sensor information is missing. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s chipset generally supports more advanced image processing capabilities. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s more powerful processor suggests better low-light performance and more sophisticated image algorithms. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), a more modern and efficient chipset than the Moto G62 5G’s Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). The 6nm process node generally leads to improved thermal efficiency and power consumption. While both CPUs feature a 2.2 GHz peak clock speed, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores offer a performance advantage over the Kryo 460 cores in the Moto G62 5G. This difference will be most apparent in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to offer a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Moto G62 5G edges out the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in endurance rating (122h vs 115h), suggesting it will last longer on a single charge under typical usage. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Moto G62 5G’s 15W charging is comparatively slow, requiring considerably more time to replenish the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G if you prioritize long battery life and a more conservative, software-focused experience. Its 122-hour endurance rating is ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more feature-rich software experience, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.