Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Moto G62 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging, coupled with the more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset fabricated on a 6nm process, provides a superior user experience despite a slightly lower endurance rating. The Moto G62 5G remains a viable option for those prioritizing a potentially longer, albeit slower-to-charge, battery life.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Slightly longer endurance rating (122h)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Clean Motorola software experience
- Significantly slower 15W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset
- Lower contrast display
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 67W charging (0-100% in 41 min)
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm)
- Likely superior display contrast
- Slightly lower endurance rating (119h)
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays capable of rendering video, but differ in key characteristics. The Poco X4 Pro 5G lists an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term often indicating a VA panel, which typically delivers deeper blacks than the IPS LCD used in the Moto G62 5G, evidenced by its measured 1571:1 contrast ratio. The Moto G62 5G achieves a respectable 552 nits of peak brightness, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s panel likely surpasses this, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both lack high refresh rates, the contrast difference is a significant visual differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent in the provided data. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups. However, without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, being a slightly higher-tier device, likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor, leading to better low-light performance. The inclusion of a dedicated Night Mode on the Poco is probable, while the Moto G62 5G may rely more heavily on software enhancements.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Moto G62 5G employs the Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). The 6nm process of the 695 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 8nm 480+. The CPU configuration is similar – both feature octa-core designs with 2x2.2 GHz performance cores – but the Kryo 660 cores in the Poco X4 Pro 5G are architecturally more advanced than the Kryo 460 cores in the Moto G62 5G, resulting in a smoother overall experience. The Poco’s chipset is better suited for sustained workloads and gaming.
Battery Life
The endurance ratings are remarkably close – 122 hours for the Moto G62 5G and 119 hours for the Poco X4 Pro 5G. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of reaching 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Moto G62 5G’s 15W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably more time to fully replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability and convenience, especially for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G if you prioritize maximizing talk time and standby duration, and are comfortable with a slower 15W charging speed. This phone is ideal for users who infrequently top up their devices and value extended battery life above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value rapid charging, a more modern chipset, and a generally more responsive user experience. This is the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery.