Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Samsung Galaxy F23: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F23 edges out the Moto G62 5G thanks to its superior chipset and faster charging. While the Moto G62 5G boasts impressive battery life, the F23's overall performance and charging speed make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Samsung Galaxy F23 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Aqua Blue, Forest Green |
| Models | - | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.24 W/kg (head) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Exceptional battery life
- High contrast AMOLED display
- Affordable price
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Less refined camera processing
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Faster performance (Snapdragon 750G)
- Faster charging (25W)
- OIS on main camera
- Samsung ecosystem
- Shorter battery life than Moto G62 5G
- IPS LCD display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Moto G62 5G features a 6.5-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a reported contrast ratio of 1571:1 and 552 nits brightness. The Galaxy F23 has a 6.6-inch FHD+ IPS LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate. While the Moto G62 5G's AMOLED offers richer colors and deeper blacks, the F23's larger size might appeal to some. Both offer smooth scrolling thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G62 5G typically features a triple camera system (50MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro) and a 16MP front camera. The Galaxy F23 usually has a triple camera setup (50MP main with OIS, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro) and a 8MP front camera. While both offer decent image quality in good lighting, the F23's OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main camera provides better stability for photos and videos, especially in low light. Samsung's image processing is also generally more refined.
Performance
Here's where the Galaxy F23 takes a significant lead. It's powered by the Snapdragon 750G 5G, a noticeably more powerful chipset than the Moto G62 5G's Snapdragon 480+ 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the F23. The Moto G62 5G is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Moto G62 5G shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 122h suggests exceptional battery life, easily lasting a day and a half or even two days with moderate usage. The Galaxy F23, while still offering good battery life, doesn't quite match the Moto G62 5G's longevity. The F23 supports 25W fast charging, while the Moto G62 5G is limited to 15W.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G62 5G is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a high contrast display on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy F23 is a better fit for those who value smoother performance, faster charging, and the Samsung ecosystem.