Moto G62 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display brightness and battery endurance, the Motorola Moto G62 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly brighter display and longer endurance rating outweigh the Galaxy A33 5G’s faster charging and more powerful chipset, especially considering the G62’s likely lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9) GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Exceptional battery life (122h endurance)
- Brighter display for outdoor use (552 nits)
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 480+)
- Slower charging speed (15W)
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- More powerful processor (Exynos 1280)
- Faster charging (25W)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Shorter battery life (104h endurance)
- Less bright display (728 nits, but still good)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term that doesn't translate to a demonstrably superior viewing experience compared to the Moto G62 5G’s 1571:1 contrast ratio. However, the A33’s 728 nits of peak brightness is notably higher than the G62’s 552 nits. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility, giving the A33 an edge in direct sunlight. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels, but the G62’s lower brightness may result in less vibrant colors and reduced readability outdoors. The lack of specific refresh rate data for both devices suggests standard 60Hz panels, a common omission in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, lacking specific details in the provided data. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The A33 likely benefits from Samsung’s more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more refined photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but Samsung’s history suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance in this segment.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G62 5G’s Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). The Exynos 1280 features Cortex-A78 performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, compared to the G62’s Kryo 460 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the A33. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos also contributes to better power efficiency, though this advantage is partially offset by the A33’s smaller battery. While the G62 is adequate for everyday tasks, the A33 is the clear winner for users who demand more from their smartphone.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G62 5G boasts a superior endurance rating of 122 hours, significantly exceeding the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G’s 104 hours. This suggests the G62’s optimization and potentially larger battery capacity (though not specified) provide longer runtimes between charges. While the A33 supports 25W wired charging, offering faster top-ups, the G62’s longer endurance mitigates the need for frequent charging. The G62’s 15W charging is slower, but the overall battery experience is likely more favorable for users who prioritize longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G if you need a phone with excellent outdoor visibility and all-day battery life, and are willing to trade some processing power for those benefits. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you prioritize faster charging speeds and a slightly more responsive experience for demanding apps, and are comfortable with a less bright display and shorter battery life.