Motorola Moto G62 5G vs OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset delivers noticeably improved performance over the Moto G62 5G’s Snapdragon 480+, and the 65W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, offsetting the slightly lower endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, February 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 65W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Gray Mirror, Bahama Blue |
| Models | - | IV2201 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | £ 99.00 / € 182.18 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Exceptional battery endurance (122h)
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset
- Slow 15W charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Nord CE 2 5G
- Display likely lacks vibrancy
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
- Significantly faster 65W SuperVOOC charging
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 900 processor
- Likely better image processing capabilities
- Potentially shorter battery life than the Moto G62 5G
- Generally a higher price tag
- No specific endurance rating provided
Display Comparison
The Moto G62 5G features a display with a measured peak brightness of 552 nits and a 1571:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, this is likely to be less vibrant than displays found on competitors. The Nord CE 2 5G’s display specifications are not provided, but OnePlus typically focuses on color accuracy and brightness in this segment. The G62’s contrast ratio suggests an IPS LCD panel, which is standard for the price, but may lack the deep blacks of an AMOLED display. Users who consume a lot of HDR content or use their phones outdoors will likely prefer a brighter display, making the Nord CE 2 5G a potentially better option if it offers higher peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Nord CE 2 5G, benefiting from a more powerful ISP within the Dimensity 900, is likely to offer superior image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Moto G62 5G will likely focus on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola G62 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 prime core and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 efficiency cores. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, however, is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm). The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 performance cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 480+’s Kryo 460 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 900 also contributes to better power efficiency. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Nord CE 2 5G.
Battery Life
The Moto G62 5G boasts an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, it’s paired with a slow 15W wired charging solution. This means a full charge will take a considerable amount of time. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, while lacking a specific endurance rating, compensates with its incredibly fast 65W SuperVOOC charging. This technology can charge the phone from 0-100% in under 40 minutes, a massive advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups. The trade-off is that the Nord CE 2 5G may not last quite as long on a single charge as the Moto G62 5G, but the convenience of rapid charging is a significant benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are on a very tight budget, and don't need demanding performance. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G if you value faster charging, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means slightly less time between charges.