Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Moto G72: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G72 edges out the G62 5G thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and the generally more powerful Helio G99 chipset. While both offer excellent battery life, the G72's overall performance and charging speed make it the slightly better choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Motorola Moto G72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, September 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White |
| Models | - | XT2255-1 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 383317 (v9) GeekBench: 1842 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Good Value
- Excellent Battery Life
- Decent Display
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Brightness Display
Motorola Moto G72
- Brighter Display
- Faster Charging (33W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Helio G99)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slightly Higher Price
- Nominal 'Infinite' Contrast Ratio (less quantifiable)
Display Comparison
The Moto G72 boasts a substantial advantage in display brightness, measuring 1015 nits compared to the G62 5G's 552 nits. This makes the G72 significantly easier to view outdoors. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1571:1 for G62, 'Infinite' nominal for G72), the G72's brightness is the key differentiator. The G72 also likely uses a more advanced panel technology, contributing to its superior visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Based on initial impressions, the G72's camera processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors and better dynamic range. However, low-light performance and video quality are likely comparable. Both phones offer standard camera features like portrait mode and HDR.
Performance
The Moto G72's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset generally outperforms the G62 5G's Snapdragon 480+ 5G. The G99's Cortex-A76 cores provide a noticeable boost in processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. While both phones handle everyday tasks well, the G72 offers a more fluid and responsive experience, especially in demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the Moto G62 5G and Moto G72 deliver exceptional battery life, with endurance ratings of 122h and 121h respectively. This translates to roughly a full day and a half of moderate usage. The G72's 33W fast charging significantly reduces charging times compared to the G62 5G's 15W charging.
Buying Guide
The Moto G62 5G is ideal for users prioritizing 5G connectivity and a good balance of features at a slightly lower price point. The Moto G72 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant, bright display, faster charging, and a more responsive performance experience, even if it means spending a bit more.