Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Moto G53: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G53 edges out the G62 5G thanks to its slightly brighter display, faster charging (in some regions), and reverse charging capability. While both offer similar performance, the G53’s incremental improvements make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G62 5G | Motorola Moto G53 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, December 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 183 g (6.46 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink |
| Models | - | XT2335-2 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 122h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Excellent contrast ratio display
- Proven track record
- Good battery life
- Slightly slower charging
- Lower peak brightness compared to G53
Motorola Moto G53
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (region dependent)
- Reverse charging capability
- Slightly better endurance rating
- International charging speed slower (10W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent contrast ratios (1571:1 for G62, 1746:1 for G53). However, the Moto G53 boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 599 nits compared to the G62's 552 nits, resulting in better visibility in direct sunlight. Both utilize an AMOLED panel, offering deep blacks and rich colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is expected to be comparable, with both phones offering a main camera setup suitable for capturing decent photos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will likely be similar, relying on software processing to compensate. Specific camera specs (megapixel counts, aperture) are not provided, but reviews generally place them in the same tier.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset and Octa-core CPU. Expect similar performance for everyday tasks, browsing, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance, but they're perfectly capable for their price range.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with endurance ratings of 122h and 123h respectively. The Moto G53 has a slight edge, but the difference is negligible in real-world usage. The G53 also offers faster charging (18W in some regions) and reverse charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G? Users prioritizing a high contrast ratio display and a proven track record. Who should buy the Motorola Moto G53? Those seeking a brighter screen, faster charging (depending on region), and the added convenience of reverse charging.