Motorola consistently delivers solid budget smartphones, and the Moto G62 5G and Moto G52 are prime examples. But which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their features, performance, and overall appeal to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G62 5G edges out the G52 thanks to its 5G connectivity, brighter display, and significantly longer battery life. While the G52 boasts faster charging, the G62's overall package provides a more compelling experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 09 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 28 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | - | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 122h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1571:1 | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 303072 (v9)
GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Brighter Display
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Generally Smoother Performance
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Potentially Larger Size
Motorola Moto G52
- Faster Charging (30W)
- Slightly More Compact Design
- Efficient Chipset
- No 5G
- Less Bright Display
- Shorter Battery Life
- Potentially Slower Performance
Display Comparison
The Moto G62 5G takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 552 nits and an impressive 1571:1 contrast ratio. The G52's display is still good, but noticeably less vibrant and bright. Both feature AMOLED panels, offering excellent color reproduction and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two, with both offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is adequate but not exceptional. Both likely feature a main sensor around 50MP, but detailed camera specs are needed for a more precise comparison. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, offering 1080p recording.
Performance
The Moto G62 5G's Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the G52's Snapdragon 680 4G, especially when handling 5G connectivity. While neither phone is a powerhouse, the G62 5G generally feels smoother for everyday tasks and light gaming. The G52's chipset is efficient, but lacks the 5G capabilities.
Battery Life
The Moto G62 5G absolutely dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 122 hours. This is significantly better than the G52. The G52 does offer faster 30W charging, which can partially offset the longer battery life of the G62 5G.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto G62 5G? Users prioritizing 5G connectivity, extended battery life, and a brighter display. Who should buy the Motorola Moto G52? Those seeking faster charging speeds and a slightly more compact design, and who don't need 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Moto G62 5G worth the extra money?
If 5G connectivity and long battery life are important to you, then yes, the Moto G62 5G is worth the extra investment. The performance gains and brighter display also contribute to a better overall experience.
❓ Which phone has better low-light camera performance?
Based on initial impressions, both phones offer adequate low-light performance, but neither excels. A more detailed camera comparison would be needed to determine a clear winner.
