Motorola Moto G60S vs Samsung Galaxy A32: A Head-to-Head Showdown

Choosing a mid-range smartphone can be tough. The Motorola Moto G60S and Samsung Galaxy A32 are both popular contenders, offering a blend of features and affordability. But which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Moto G60S takes the lead with its significantly faster processor and 50W charging, offering a more premium experience. However, the Galaxy A32 boasts a brighter display and potentially longer software support, making it a solid choice for those prioritizing those aspects. Ultimately, the G60S provides better performance for the price.

PHONES
Phone Names	Motorola Moto G60S	Samsung Galaxy A32

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA, LTE
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE

Launch
Announced	2021, August 12	2021, February 25
Status	Available. Released 2021, August 12	Available. Released 2021, February 25

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in)	158.9 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	212 g (7.48 oz)	184 g (6.49 oz)
	Water repellent design	-

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Size	6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)	6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM)	Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm)	Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm)
GPU	Mali-G76 MC4	Mali-G52 MC2
OS	Android 11	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM	64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.1	-

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad	64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single	-	20 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video	4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	LED flash, HDR	-
Single	16 MP, f/2.2, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Radio	FM radio	FM radio, RDS, recording
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	50W wired, QC4	15W wired
Type	Li-Po 5000 mAh	Li-Ion 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Green, Blue	Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet
Models	XT2133-2, XT2133-1	SM-A325F, SM-A325F/DS, SM-A325M, SM-A325N
Price	About 200 EUR	€ 124.99 / £ 89.38
SAR EU	-	0.45 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 119h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 286666 (v8) GeekBench: 1277 (v5.1) GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto G60S

Faster Processor (Helio G95)
50W Fast Charging
Generally better performance
Competitive Price

Potentially shorter software support
Lower peak display brightness
IPS LCD display (likely)

Samsung Galaxy A32

Brighter Display (814 nits)
Excellent Battery Life (119h endurance)
Samsung's Brand Reputation
Potentially longer software support

Slower Processor (Helio G80)
15W Slow Charging
Less powerful overall performance

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A32 shines with its measured 814 nits max brightness, making it easier to view outdoors. While the Moto G60S display is good, it lacks the same peak brightness. The A32's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but generally indicates good contrast. Both use similar display technology (likely AMOLED for A32 and IPS LCD for G60S), so color accuracy will be a key differentiator.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer versatile camera setups, but the Galaxy A32's image processing might be slightly more refined. The G60S likely benefits from its more powerful processor for faster image processing. Low-light performance will be a key area to compare, as will video recording capabilities. Both likely offer a main wide-angle lens, ultrawide, and macro lens.

Performance

Here, the Moto G60S has a clear advantage. The Helio G95 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Helio G80 in the Galaxy A32. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the G60S. The Cortex-A76 cores in the G95 provide a significant boost.

Battery Life

The Galaxy A32 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Moto G60S has a decent battery, it's unlikely to match the A32's longevity. However, the G60S's 50W charging significantly reduces charging times, offsetting some of the battery life difference.

Buying Guide

The Motorola Moto G60S is ideal for users who prioritize performance, fast charging, and a smoother overall experience. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a better fit for those who value a brighter display, potentially longer software updates, and a more established brand reputation.