Motorola Moto G60S vs Moto G71 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G71 5G edges out the G60S thanks to its 5G connectivity, more efficient chipset, and slightly better display. While the G60S boasts faster charging, the G71 5G's overall package provides a more modern and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G60S | Motorola Moto G71 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 12 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 12 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 50W wired, QC4 | 30W / 33W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black |
| Models | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 | XT2169-1, XT2169-2 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G60S
- Faster Charging (50W)
- Slightly More Powerful CPU Core
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Gaming Performance
- IPS LCD Display
- Less Efficient Chipset
- No 5G Connectivity
- Image Processing Could Be Better
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- AMOLED Display with 120Hz
- More Efficient Chipset
- Better Image Processing
- Slightly Better Battery Life
- Slower Charging (30W)
- Slightly Lower Resolution Display
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.8-inch display, but the G71 5G utilizes an AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering richer colors and smoother scrolling compared to the G60S's IPS LCD. The G60S has a slightly higher resolution (2460 x 1080) versus the G71 5G (2400 x 1080), but the AMOLED advantage is significant.
Camera Comparison
The G60S features a 64MP main camera, while the G71 5G also has a 64MP main camera. However, the G71 5G's image processing and overall camera software are generally considered superior, producing more vibrant and detailed photos. Both offer ultrawide and macro lenses, but the G71 5G's results are typically more consistent.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the G71 5G is built on a more efficient 6nm process, resulting in better power efficiency and generally smoother performance than the G60S's Helio G95 (12nm). While the G60S has a slightly more powerful CPU core (Cortex-A76), the Snapdragon's overall architecture and efficiency give the G71 5G the edge in everyday tasks and multitasking.
Battery Life
The G60S has a 5000mAh battery and 50W fast charging, allowing it to charge from 0 to 50% in roughly 30 minutes. The G71 5G has a 5000mAh battery but only supports 30W charging, taking longer to reach 50%. Despite the slower charging, the G71 5G's more efficient chipset often results in slightly better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G60S is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful processor for gaming, especially if 5G isn't a necessity. The Motorola Moto G71 5G is the better choice for those wanting 5G connectivity, a smoother user experience, and a more modern chipset, even with slightly slower charging.