Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) vs. Motorola Moto G60: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Moto G60’s Snapdragon 732G and 20W charging. However, the Moto G60 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users who value a solid all-around experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G60 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | - |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola Moto G60
- Potentially larger battery capacity for extended runtime.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Clean Android experience (typical of Motorola).
- Slower Snapdragon 732G processor.
- Significantly slower 20W charging.
- Likely LCD display with lower peak brightness.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 processor for smooth performance.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0.
- Likely AMOLED display with vibrant colors and high brightness.
- Potentially smaller battery capacity.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be resource-intensive.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Redmi Note 10 Pro historically features AMOLED panels, offering superior contrast and color vibrancy compared to the Moto G60’s likely LCD. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s panel likely boasts a higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 120Hz refresh rate (common for this model) would provide smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent in the Moto G60. Bezels are expected to be similar, but the AMOLED panel gives the Redmi Note 10 Pro a visual edge.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can infer based on market positioning. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is likely to feature a higher resolution main sensor and potentially more advanced image processing algorithms. While both phones likely include multiple lenses, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s image quality will likely be superior, particularly in low-light conditions. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s camera system is geared towards more detailed and vibrant photos, while the Moto G60 likely prioritizes a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs makes a definitive statement difficult, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s brand reputation suggests a stronger camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 1100, built on a 6nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G60’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz) deliver significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The Snapdragon 732G’s Kryo 470 cores, while efficient, are clocked lower (2.3 GHz). The 6nm node of the Dimensity 1100 also translates to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is the clear winner for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Moto G60 likely has a larger battery capacity to compensate for the less efficient 8nm Snapdragon 732G. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer. A full charge in just 42 minutes, supported by PD3.0, drastically reduces downtime. The Moto G60’s 20W charging with QC4, while respectable, is significantly slower. While the Moto G60 might offer longer screen-on time due to a potentially larger battery, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s charging speed provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't demand the absolute fastest performance. It's ideal for users who prioritize efficiency and a more conservative approach to power consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. This is the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.