The Motorola Moto G60 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a strong user experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches. The G60 prioritizes efficiency with the Snapdragon 732G, while the X3 Pro goes for outright performance with the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 860. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860, despite being an older generation chip, offers a significant performance uplift over the Moto G60’s Snapdragon 732G. However, the Moto G60 remains a viable option for those seeking a more balanced device with decent battery life and a lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G60
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 732G.
- More affordable price point (likely).
- Clean software experience (typical of Motorola).
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Snapdragon 860.
- Slower charging speed (20W vs 33W).
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 860.
- Faster 33W charging.
- Likely better gaming experience.
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.
- May run warmer during intensive tasks.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on gaming, it’s likely to have a slightly faster refresh rate (a common feature in gaming phones) than the Moto G60, though this isn't confirmed. Bezels are likely comparable given the price bracket, and without specific color accuracy data, it’s difficult to determine which offers a more color-accurate display.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco X3 Pro might prioritize camera performance slightly more, potentially offering better low-light capabilities. The presence of a dedicated Night Mode or advanced image processing algorithms on the Poco X3 Pro is more likely. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significant step up from the Motorola Moto G60’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core, alongside three additional Gold cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Silver cores at 1.78 GHz, compared to the G60’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. This translates to substantially faster CPU and GPU performance on the Poco X3 Pro, particularly in gaming. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, though the G60’s 8nm node isn’t inefficient. The Poco X3 Pro will handle demanding titles at higher settings with less throttling.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is significantly faster than the Moto G60’s 20W charging with QC4 support. This means the Poco X3 Pro can be topped up much quicker, mitigating the potential battery drain from its more powerful processor. While both offer all-day battery life for moderate users, the Poco X3 Pro’s faster charging provides a crucial convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and aren't heavily invested in demanding mobile games. It's ideal for users who prioritize efficiency and a smooth, consistent experience over peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games and applications with ease. It’s the better choice for gamers and power users who demand responsiveness and don't mind potentially shorter battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 is a powerful chip, it's an older generation and benefits from mature thermal management profiles. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates heat dissipation features, but sustained gaming at maximum settings may still lead to some throttling. However, it's unlikely to experience severe overheating that would render the phone unusable.
❓ Is the 20W charging on the Moto G60 slow compared to the Poco X3 Pro's 33W?
Yes, 20W is considerably slower than 33W. The Poco X3 Pro can reach 100% charge in approximately 59 minutes, while the Moto G60 will take significantly longer. This difference is noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Can the Moto G60 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Moto G60 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 732G isn't designed for maximum performance in demanding games, so expect some compromises in visual fidelity.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate displays for smoother gaming?
While not explicitly stated in the provided data, the Poco X3 Pro is highly likely to feature a 120Hz display, a common feature in gaming-focused phones. This would provide a significantly smoother visual experience compared to the standard 60Hz display typically found on devices in this price range.
