Motorola Moto G60 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the 800 nit display offers a brighter, more vibrant viewing experience. While the Moto G60 offers a slightly lower entry price, the A52s 5G delivers better value overall.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G60 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 280 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G60
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- QC4 fast charging support
- Less powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Inferior camera processing
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display
- Faster 25W charging
- Slightly higher price
- Battery life comparable to Moto G60
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Moto G60’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Moto G60’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower-quality panel overall. The A52s 5G’s display is likely to offer a more immersive and visually pleasing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the A52s 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality due to its more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 778G. While specific sensor details are missing, the A52s 5G’s chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing, resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall detail. The Moto G60’s camera system, while functional, is likely to be limited by the processing power of the Snapdragon 732G. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lens found on both, the main sensor and processing pipeline on the A52s 5G will provide a more consistent and higher-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Moto G60 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm), while the A52s 5G features the Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 778G’s 6nm process node is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. Furthermore, the 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is architecturally superior to the G60’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver setup. This results in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the A52s 5G. The A52s 5G will handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W charging capability is faster than the Moto G60’s 20W charging with QC4 support. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn't specified for either, the more efficient Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G likely contributes to similar endurance despite potentially having a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you prioritize maximizing battery life on a tight budget and don't require demanding gaming performance. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, stream, and communicate. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother user experience, better camera capabilities, and a brighter, more enjoyable display, even if it means spending a bit more.