The Motorola Moto G60 and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon 7-series chipsets, but diverge significantly in charging speed and overall feature set. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. While the Moto G60 offers a slightly newer chipset, the Realme 8 Pro’s significantly faster 50W charging – capable of a full charge in under an hour – and potentially more refined camera experience outweigh the marginal performance difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G60
- Slightly newer Snapdragon 732G chipset
- QC4 support for compatible chargers
- Potentially more natural color reproduction
- Significantly slower 20W charging
- Less publicized camera system
- May exhibit more thermal throttling under heavy load
Realme 8 Pro
- Ultra-fast 50W charging (0-100% in 47 minutes)
- Likely superior camera system (based on 108MP sensor)
- Potentially more vibrant display tuning
- Older Snapdragon 720G chipset
- May prioritize saturated image processing
- No specific details on display quality beyond contrast ratio
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The Realme 8 Pro’s display is likely tuned for vibrant colors, a common Realme trait, while Motorola typically aims for more natural color reproduction. Without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The Realme 8 Pro is known for its 108MP main sensor (not in provided data, but a key marketing feature), which allows for detailed images and pixel binning for improved low-light performance. The Moto G60’s camera system is less publicized. Without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. Image processing algorithms will also play a crucial role, with Realme typically favoring more saturated and contrasty images.
Performance
The Moto G60 features the Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G, built on an 8nm process, with an octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver). The Realme 8 Pro utilizes the SM7125 Snapdragon 720G, also 8nm, with a similar octa-core setup (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver). While the 732G is a slightly newer iteration, the real-world performance difference will be minimal for most users. Both chips are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The key difference lies in sustained performance; the 732G *may* exhibit slightly better thermal throttling characteristics under prolonged load, but this requires independent testing. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR4X is likely on both.
Battery Life
Both the Moto G60 and Realme 8 Pro boast an endurance rating of 116 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Moto G60 supports 20W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4), while the Realme 8 Pro features a blazing-fast 50W wired charging solution, achieving 50% charge in 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. This charging speed is a significant advantage for the Realme 8 Pro, especially for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you prioritize a slightly newer processor generation and are less concerned with rapid charging. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value fast charging above all else, frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly, and appreciate a potentially more polished camera system. It’s ideal for users on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver the highest possible graphics settings, it provides a playable experience. The Realme 8 Pro's thermal management will be key to maintaining consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 20W charging on the Moto G60 in real-world use?
The 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro is dramatically faster. It can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 47 minutes, while the Moto G60 takes considerably longer. This means you can quickly top up your Realme 8 Pro during short breaks, whereas the Moto G60 requires a more substantial charging period.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone worth using for close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited image quality. They often lack detail and sharpness. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-level macro photography from either device.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos in low-light conditions?
The Realme 8 Pro likely performs better in low-light due to its 108MP main sensor (not in provided data, but a key feature). Larger sensors capture more light, resulting in brighter and more detailed images in challenging lighting conditions. The Moto G60's camera performance in low light is less certain without specific sensor details.
