Motorola Moto G60 vs OnePlus Nord CE 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and affordability, the Motorola Moto G60 emerges as the stronger choice. While the OnePlus Nord CE 5G offers faster 30W charging and a brighter screen, the G60’s Snapdragon 732G provides sufficient performance for daily tasks and the larger battery ensures longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G60 | OnePlus Nord CE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Water repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.9 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9) GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G60
- Potentially longer battery life due to larger capacity.
- More affordable price point.
- Snapdragon 732G is a proven performer for everyday tasks.
- Slower charging speed (20W vs 30W).
- Likely dimmer display compared to the Nord CE 5G.
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Faster 30W charging with 70% in 30 minutes.
- Brighter display (607 nits) for better outdoor visibility.
- Snapdragon 750G offers a slight performance edge.
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Moto G60.
- Generally higher price than the Moto G60.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 607 nits, which translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Moto G60’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting standard OLED panels. The Nord CE 5G’s higher brightness is a significant advantage for outdoor users, while the G60 likely prioritizes power efficiency in its display implementation.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nord CE 5G may prioritize image processing and software features. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. It's reasonable to assume both phones will struggle in low-light conditions without significant software intervention.
Performance
Both phones utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon 7-series chipsets fabricated on an 8nm process, but the Nord CE 5G’s Snapdragon 750G represents a step up from the Moto G60’s Snapdragon 732G. The 750G features Kryo 570 cores compared to the 732G’s Kryo 470 cores, offering a modest performance increase. Both CPUs share a similar octa-core configuration (2x high-performance & 6x efficiency cores), but the 750G’s slightly higher clock speeds (2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz) and newer architecture should result in smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times. The G60's 2.3GHz clock speed on the prime cores is a slight advantage in single-core tasks, but the 750G's overall architecture is more efficient.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola Moto G60 and OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life *despite* differing charging capabilities. The G60’s larger battery capacity (unspecified, but likely larger than the Nord CE 5G to achieve the same endurance with a less efficient chipset) is offset by the Nord CE 5G’s faster 30W charging, which can reach 70% charge in just 30 minutes. The Moto G60’s 20W charging with QC4 support is slower, requiring more time to fully replenish the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use, and value maximizing battery life over the absolute fastest charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who stream a lot of video, game casually, or frequently travel where access to power is limited. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you prefer a brighter display for outdoor visibility and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 30W charging, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.