Motorola Moto G60 vs Nokia X20: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G60 is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 732G chipset provides noticeably better performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and the 20W Quick Charge support is faster than the Nokia X20’s 18W charging. While the X20 offers a cleaner software experience, the G60’s performance advantage is more impactful for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G60 | Nokia X20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, May 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.8 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Water repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4470 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Midnight Sun, Nordic Blue |
| Models | PANB0001IN, PANB0013IN, PANB0015IN | TA-1341, TA-1344 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G60
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 732G
- Faster 20W Quick Charge 4 charging
- Likely better gaming performance
- Motorola’s software can be bloated
- Potentially less frequent software updates
Nokia X20
- Clean, near-stock Android experience
- Nokia’s commitment to software updates
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- May struggle with demanding apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, both utilize 8nm chipsets which indirectly suggest a focus on efficiency over pushing display boundaries. The absence of high refresh rates on either device indicates a cost-saving measure. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. Color accuracy will likely be standard for the price point, leaning towards acceptable rather than exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the G60 likely prioritizes megapixel count for marketing, while Nokia often focuses on image processing. The Snapdragon 732G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the 480’s, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance on the G60. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which can introduce artifacts. Avoid placing too much weight on the presence of 2MP macro lenses on either phone; their image quality is typically subpar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G60’s Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver – compared to the Nokia X20’s Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460. This translates to a tangible performance advantage for the G60 in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both are 8nm, the 732G’s higher clock speeds and more advanced core architecture deliver superior throughput. The G60 will exhibit less stuttering and faster app loading times. The Snapdragon 480 in the X20 is sufficient for basic tasks, but will struggle with graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Motorola Moto G60’s 20W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support provides a significant advantage over the Nokia X20’s 18W charging. This means the G60 will reach a full charge considerably faster, minimizing downtime. While battery life will depend on usage patterns, the G60’s more efficient chipset and faster charging combine for a better overall user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G60 if you need a phone that can handle demanding apps, mobile gaming, and benefit from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who prioritize performance over software purity. Buy the Nokia X20 if you prefer a near-stock Android experience with guaranteed software updates and value a more streamlined, less cluttered interface, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.