The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, released in 2021, was a performance king in its price bracket. Now, the Motorola Moto G57 enters the scene with a newer, more efficient chipset. This comparison dissects whether the newer architecture of the G57 can overcome the X3 Pro’s older, but more powerful, silicon.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro remains the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 delivers significantly higher performance, crucial for gaming and demanding tasks, despite the Moto G57’s more efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4. However, the G57 offers a more modern platform and potentially better long-term software support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 05 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Regatta | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G57
- More efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm)
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Modern Android experience
- Significantly lower CPU and GPU performance
- Missing detailed display specifications
- Camera specs are unknown
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 860 (7nm) for gaming and demanding tasks
- Faster 33W charging
- Proven performance track record
- Older chipset architecture
- Potentially less frequent software updates
- Less power efficient
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the Moto G57. The X3 Pro’s display, while adequate, isn’t known for being a standout feature. The G57’s newer panel *could* offer improvements in color accuracy and viewing angles, but without concrete data, it’s difficult to assess. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. The X3 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 860, potentially offering better image processing and video stabilization. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. The G57’s newer chipset *could* offer improved computational photography features, but the X3 Pro’s more powerful processor provides a foundation for faster image processing. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) boasts a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional performance cores, offering a substantial performance advantage over the Moto G57’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm). While the 4nm process of the G57’s chip is more efficient, the 860’s architecture and higher clock speeds translate to significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The G57’s octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is geared towards efficiency, while the X3 Pro’s (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) prioritizes raw power. This difference is particularly noticeable in sustained workloads where thermal throttling may occur.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the X3 Pro’s 33W charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is significantly faster than what’s typically found in the Moto G57’s price range. While the G57’s more efficient chipset *may* offset the X3 Pro’s larger power draw during intensive tasks, the X3 Pro offers a more convenient charging experience. The 4nm process of the G57’s chip should contribute to lower standby power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G57 if you prioritize battery efficiency, a newer Android experience, and don't heavily rely on intensive mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive applications, and are willing to accept a slightly older chipset and potentially less frequent software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known to generate heat under sustained load. However, the Poco X3 Pro incorporates a heat pipe and graphite sheet to mitigate thermal throttling. While some performance degradation is possible during prolonged gaming, it generally remains playable. The Moto G57’s 6s Gen 4 will run cooler, but at the cost of overall performance.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 handle multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 860?
The Snapdragon 860’s superior CPU and GPU performance translate to smoother multitasking, especially when switching between demanding applications. The 6s Gen 4 is capable of handling everyday multitasking, but will likely exhibit more lag when running multiple resource-intensive apps simultaneously. The X3 Pro’s larger memory bandwidth also contributes to a more responsive multitasking experience.
❓ Is the Moto G57 a good choice for playing graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Moto G57 can *run* these games, the experience will be significantly compromised compared to the Poco X3 Pro. Expect lower frame rates, reduced graphical settings, and potential stuttering. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 simply lacks the raw power to deliver a smooth gaming experience in demanding titles. The X3 Pro is the clear winner for mobile gaming.
