The Motorola Moto G57 and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches. The Moto G57 leverages a newer, more efficient chipset, while the Realme 8 Pro boasts faster charging and a proven track record. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G57 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a noticeable efficiency advantage and potentially better sustained performance compared to the older 8nm Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro. While the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W charging is faster, the G57’s modern architecture provides a more future-proof foundation.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 05 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | - | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Regatta | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | - | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G57
- More efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Modern 4nm process for better thermal management
- Potentially smoother performance in demanding tasks
- Display specs are largely unknown
- Charging speed not specified, likely slower than Realme 8 Pro
Realme 8 Pro
- 50W fast charging (50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min)
- Established brand reputation for camera performance
- Good battery endurance (116h)
- Older 8nm Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Less efficient processor, potentially leading to throttling
- May not receive as many software updates as newer devices
Display Comparison
Both the Moto G57 and Realme 8 Pro share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the G57. The Realme 8 Pro’s display, while lacking high-end features like LTPO, benefits from Realme’s image processing, potentially offering a more vibrant viewing experience. Without specific data on the G57’s panel, the Realme 8 Pro likely holds an edge in display quality based on brand reputation and available information.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s history suggests a focus on camera performance, often including larger sensors and advanced features. The Moto G57’s camera performance will likely be adequate for everyday use, but the Realme 8 Pro may offer more versatility and image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information on OIS for either device makes it impossible to assess stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G57’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 4nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The G57’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a more modern architecture than the 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver in the Realme 8 Pro. While the 720G was a capable chip in its time, the 6s Gen 4 provides a clear advantage in both single-core and multi-core performance, benefiting users who multitask or play graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving 50% charge in 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. The Moto G57’s charging speed is not specified, but it’s likely slower. While the G57’s more efficient chipset may offset the slower charging to some extent, the Realme 8 Pro offers a more convenient charging experience for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G57 if you prioritize long-term performance, efficiency, and a smoother overall user experience, especially if you frequently use demanding apps or play mobile games. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if fast charging is paramount and you value a phone with a well-established reputation, even if it means sacrificing some processing power and efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G57 handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 is a capable chipset, but its performance in demanding games will depend on the game's optimization. While it won't match flagship-level performance, it should be able to run PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 4nm process should help mitigate throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the Realme 8 Pro's 50W charging compare to other phones in this price range?
50W charging is relatively fast for phones in this price bracket. It's significantly quicker than the standard 15W or 18W charging found on many competitors. While not as fast as some flagship phones with 65W or 80W charging, it provides a substantial convenience boost, allowing you to quickly top up your battery when needed.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Moto G57 a cause for concern?
It is a concern. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing capabilities, it's difficult to assess the G57's camera performance. It suggests Motorola isn't positioning the camera as a primary selling point. Expect adequate results for casual photography, but don't anticipate flagship-level image quality.
