The Motorola Moto G57 Power and Samsung Galaxy A15 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The G57 Power aims for a balance of performance and efficiency with its newer Snapdragon chipset, while the Galaxy A15 prioritizes long-lasting battery life and a bright display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G57 Power emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset, built on a more efficient 4nm process, delivers noticeably better performance and potentially superior thermal management compared to the Galaxy A15’s Helio G99. While the A15 boasts impressive battery endurance, the G57 Power’s faster charging and overall responsiveness give it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 05 | 2023, December 11 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December 03 | Available. Released 2023, December 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - India; other regions | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210.6 g (7.44 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 16, planned upgrade to Android 17 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W/33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Meteorite, Regatta | Brave Black, Optimistic Blue, Magical Blue, Personality Yellow |
| Models | - | SM-A155F, SM-A155F/DSN, SM-A155M, SM-A155M/DS, SM-A155P, SM-A155R |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 168.99 / $ 125.00 / £ 113.00 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.42 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G57 Power
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Faster 30W/33W charging
- Potentially better thermal management
- Battery life likely shorter than Galaxy A15
- Display brightness potentially lower than Galaxy A15
Samsung Galaxy A15
- Exceptional battery life (15:28h active use)
- Bright 808 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Larger screen size for immersive viewing
- Less powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A15 takes the lead in display brightness, achieving a measured 808 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While the Moto G57 Power’s display specs aren’t provided, Samsung’s panel technology generally offers vibrant colors and good viewing angles. However, the A15’s LCD panel likely lacks the contrast ratio of an OLED, which is sometimes found in this price bracket. The A15’s larger screen size (typically 6.6 inches vs. the G57 Power’s 6.5 inches) provides a more immersive viewing experience, but may impact one-handed usability.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, focusing on sensor size and image processing is crucial. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark, but the G57 Power’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 may offer superior noise reduction and dynamic range. The prevalence of 2MP macro and depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; these are often included for marketing purposes rather than significant image quality improvements. Image processing style will also differentiate the two – Motorola typically aims for a more natural look, while Samsung often boosts saturation.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G57 Power’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) represents a clear architectural advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A15’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm). The 4nm fabrication process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better performance per watt. The G57 Power’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores compared to the A15’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming. The G57 Power is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A15 shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 15:28h of active use. This suggests a large battery capacity (likely 5000mAh or greater) and efficient power management. The Moto G57 Power’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset’s efficiency could partially offset the A15’s larger battery. The G57 Power compensates with faster charging at 30W/33W, compared to the A15’s 25W. This translates to quicker top-ups, reducing downtime. While the A15 offers longer runtimes, the G57 Power’s faster charging provides more flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G57 Power if you prioritize a smoother user experience, faster app loading times, and better performance for casual gaming. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask or want a phone that feels responsive. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 if maximizing battery life is your absolute top priority, and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media browsing. It’s a solid choice for those who want a phone that can easily last a full day – or even longer – on a single charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G99 in the Galaxy A15 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 is known to throttle under sustained load, meaning performance will decrease over time to manage heat. While it's capable of running most mobile games, expect frame rate drops and potential stuttering during extended gaming sessions. The Moto G57 Power’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a more efficient process, is less prone to overheating.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 25W and 33W?
The difference is noticeable. While both aren't exceptionally fast by modern standards, 33W charging on the Moto G57 Power will replenish the battery significantly faster than the Galaxy A15’s 25W. Expect a 0-100% charge to take approximately 1.5-2 hours on the G57 Power, compared to 2-2.5 hours on the A15.
❓ Is the Galaxy A15 a good choice for streaming video?
The Galaxy A15’s bright 808 nit display makes it well-suited for streaming video, especially outdoors. However, the Helio G99’s processing power might struggle with decoding high-resolution video formats (like 4K) smoothly. The Moto G57 Power’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 offers a more robust video decoding experience.
