Motorola Moto G57 Power vs. Moto G Power (2024): A Deep Dive into Chipsets and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Motorola Moto G57 Power is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a 4nm process, offers a more refined experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. However, the Moto G Power (2024) is compelling for those who value wireless charging convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G57 Power | Motorola Moto G Power (2024) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International | 2, 5, 7, 12, 14, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 05 | 2024, March 12 |
| Status | Coming soon. Exp. release 2025, December 03 | Available. Released 2024, March 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) | 167.2 x 76.4 x 8.5 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - India; other regions | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 210.6 g (7.44 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 16, planned upgrade to Android 17 | Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W/33W wired | 30W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Fluidity, Pink Lemonade, Corsair, Meteorite, Regatta | Midnight Blue, Pale Lilac |
| Models | - | XT2415-3, XT2415V |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 75.00 / C$ 209.97 / £ 149.00 |
Motorola Moto G57 Power
- More efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 4nm process
- Likely better thermal management
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less powerful GPU compared to the Dimensity 7020
Motorola Moto G Power (2024)
- Convenience of 15W wireless charging
- Dimensity 7020 offers solid multi-core performance
- Potentially more advanced ISP features
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7020 chipset
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to G57 Power
Display Comparison
Both devices are likely to feature similar LCD panels, given their price points, but detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are not provided. The focus here is on internal components. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate control, impacting power consumption during dynamic content viewing. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is limited. However, Motorola typically employs similar camera setups across its G series. The image processing style will likely differ slightly between the two, influenced by the ISP within each chipset. The Dimensity 7020's ISP might offer more advanced features, but the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 is no slouch. We can assume both phones will include a standard macro lens, which are often of limited practical use.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Moto G57 Power’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture and smaller fabrication node compared to the Moto G Power (2024)’s Dimensity 7020 (6nm). While the Dimensity 7020 has a slightly different CPU core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 in the Snapdragon), the 4nm process of the Snapdragon translates to better thermal efficiency and potentially longer sustained performance. The Snapdragon's Cortex-A78 cores, while fewer in number, operate at a higher clock speed, potentially offering a performance edge in single-core tasks. The G Power (2024) may show its strength in multi-threaded workloads, but the Snapdragon's efficiency will be more noticeable in everyday use.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 30W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds from 0-100%. However, the Moto G Power (2024) adds 15W wireless charging, a significant convenience factor. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4's efficiency in the G57 Power could translate to comparable or even better real-world battery life despite a potentially smaller battery size. The 4nm process allows for lower power draw during typical usage scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G57 Power if you need a phone that balances performance and battery life without sacrificing efficiency, making it ideal for daily use and moderate multitasking. Buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2024) if you prefer the convenience of wireless charging and are willing to trade a small degree of processing efficiency for that feature, and potentially experience slightly more thermal throttling under sustained load.