Motorola Moto G56 vs. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and a vibrant display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 120W charging and significantly brighter screen outweigh the Moto G56’s superior battery cycle count. However, users who value longevity and are less concerned with rapid top-ups will find the G56 a solid choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G56 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Black Oyster, Gray Mist, Dazzling Blue, Dill | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | XT2529-2, XT2529-1 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | $ 221.00 / C$ 259.99 / £ 155.99 / € 159.50 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Motorola Moto G56
- Exceptional battery endurance (49:00h)
- Long battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Efficient Dimensity 7060 chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than competitors
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (19 minutes to full)
- Bright 1283 nit display
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Shorter battery lifespan compared to Moto G56
- Potentially lower overall battery endurance
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1283 nits, compared to the Moto G56 (brightness data unavailable). This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the G56’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes AMOLED, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. The lack of LTPO on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency, but the Redmi’s brightness advantage is a major differentiator for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are limited for the Moto G56. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more advanced camera system, though details are missing. The Redmi’s image processing capabilities, coupled with a potentially larger sensor (details unavailable), will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Without specific sensor details for the G56, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Redmi’s positioning suggests a more robust camera experience.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s Dimensity 7200 Ultra, fabricated on a 4nm process, holds a clear advantage over the Moto G56’s Dimensity 7060 (6nm). The 4nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the Redmi is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Redmi’s CPU configuration (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715) also offers a clock speed advantage over the G56’s (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78). While both utilize octa-core designs, the Redmi’s architecture is newer and more efficient, promising a smoother experience in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Moto G56 claims an impressive 49:00h endurance, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ compensates for potentially lower endurance (10:38h active use) with its groundbreaking 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. The G56’s 30W charging is considerably slower. Furthermore, the G56 boasts a 1000 cycle battery lifespan, indicating greater long-term battery health. This is a trade-off: the Redmi offers convenience, while the Moto prioritizes longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G56 if you need exceptional battery longevity and are willing to trade off charging speed and display brightness. This phone is ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day and prefer a device that will hold its charge for extended periods. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a stunningly bright display, incredibly fast charging, and don't mind potentially replacing the battery sooner. This phone is perfect for media consumers, gamers, and anyone who wants to minimize downtime.