Moto G56 vs. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Motorola Moto G56 emerges as the stronger choice. Its impressive 49-hour battery endurance and efficient Dimensity 7060 chipset offer a worry-free experience. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s brighter display and more versatile camera system appeal to power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G56 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2023, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - InternationalOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Xclipse 920 - InternationalAdreno 730 - USA |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Black Oyster, Gray Mist, Dazzling Blue, Dill | Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine |
| Models | XT2529-2, XT2529-1 | SM-S711B, SM-S711B/DS, SM-S711U1, SM-S711U, SM-S711W, SM-S7110, SM-S711N |
| Price | $ 221.00 / C$ 259.99 / £ 155.99 / € 159.50 | $ 219.95 / C$ 327.90 / £ 248.99 / € 272.00 / ₹ 34,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.76 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Motorola Moto G56
- Exceptional 49-hour battery life
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7060 chipset
- Long-lasting battery health (1000 cycles)
- Likely dimmer display compared to S23 FE
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- Brighter 985 nit display
- More powerful Exynos 2200/Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- More versatile camera system with OIS
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Potential for regional chipset variations (Exynos vs Snapdragon)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 985 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Moto G56’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The S23 FE’s panel technology is also likely to be superior, potentially including LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better power efficiency. The S23 FE’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system, offering features like optical image stabilization (OIS) and advanced image processing algorithms. While the G56 likely has a capable camera, the S23 FE’s sensor size and lens apertures are likely superior, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The S23 FE’s video capabilities will also be more advanced, potentially including 8K recording. The inclusion of a dedicated telephoto lens on the S23 FE provides versatility the G56 likely lacks.
Performance
The chipset is where the biggest difference lies. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE ships with either the Exynos 2200 (International) or the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (USA), both built on a 4nm process. These chips offer significantly higher peak performance than the Motorola Moto G56’s Mediatek Dimensity 7060 (6nm). The S23 FE’s CPU, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core, will excel in demanding tasks like video editing and gaming. However, the Dimensity 7060’s Cortex-A78 cores provide a solid mid-range experience, and the 6nm process may offer better thermal efficiency under sustained loads, potentially reducing throttling. The S23 FE’s LPDDR5 RAM (speculation based on flagship positioning) will also contribute to faster app loading and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G56’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 49 hours. This is significantly longer than the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s active use score of 8 hours and 28 minutes. While the S23 FE offers faster charging at 25W with PD3.0 and 15W wireless charging, the G56’s longevity is a major advantage. The G56 also boasts a claimed 1000 charge cycles, suggesting superior long-term battery health. The S23 FE’s 50% charge in 30 minutes is convenient, but the G56’s overall endurance is more impactful for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G56 if you need a phone that lasts all day and beyond, prioritizing battery life and reliable performance over cutting-edge features. It’s ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, a more capable camera system for photography and videography, and don't mind potentially shorter battery life and the possibility of regional chipset variations.