Motorola Moto G56 vs. Edge 50 Fusion: Which Mid-Range Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Motorola Moto G56 is the clear winner. Its impressive 49-hour battery endurance significantly outpaces the Edge 50 Fusion. However, the Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W charging and brighter display make it a compelling choice for those who value speed and visual clarity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G56 | Motorola Edge 50 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 29 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7060 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Black Oyster, Gray Mist, Dazzling Blue, Dill | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | XT2529-2, XT2529-1 | XT2429-1 |
| Price | $ 221.00 / C$ 259.99 / £ 155.99 / € 159.50 | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 49:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class A | - |
Motorola Moto G56
- Exceptional 49-hour battery life
- Potentially better sustained performance due to efficient chipset
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term reliability
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely less vibrant display compared to the Fusion
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Brighter 1322 nit display for outdoor visibility
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Significantly shorter battery life (12:40h active use)
- Regional chipset variations (Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in LATAM)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1322 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. The Moto G56’s display specifications are not provided, implying a standard LCD panel likely with lower peak brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor users. While the G56 likely offers adequate color reproduction, the Fusion’s higher brightness translates to a more immersive viewing experience. The Fusion’s panel technology is also likely to have a higher contrast ratio, further enhancing image quality.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset difference suggests the Edge 50 Fusion likely benefits from a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, potentially resulting in better image processing and low-light performance. The G56’s Dimensity 7060 ISP is capable, but generally lags behind Qualcomm’s offerings. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the Fusion’s processor gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The Edge 50 Fusion, equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), holds a performance advantage over the Moto G56’s MediaTek Dimensity 7060 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon chip yields better power efficiency and thermal management, potentially leading to sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Fusion’s CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 - International, or 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 - LATAM) offers a slight clock speed advantage over the G56’s (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). However, the G56’s higher clocked A78 cores might offer a burst of speed in certain scenarios. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized ISP and AI engine.
Battery Life
The Moto G56’s standout feature is its exceptional 49-hour battery endurance, a testament to the efficiency of the Dimensity 7060 and likely optimized software. The Edge 50 Fusion, while offering a respectable 12:40h active use score, falls significantly short. However, the Fusion compensates with its 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The G56’s 30W charging is considerably slower. This trade-off positions the G56 as the choice for multi-day use, while the Fusion is better suited for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G56 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and prioritize battery life above all else. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, significantly faster charging speeds, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery endurance. The Fusion caters to users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.