Motorola Moto G55 vs Sony Xperia 10 VII: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing maximum uptime, the Motorola Moto G55 is the clear winner, offering over 52 hours of endurance. However, the Sony Xperia 10 VII provides a superior viewing experience with its brighter display and a more modern chipset, making it ideal for media consumption and everyday tasks where a charger isn't always accessible.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G55 | Sony Xperia 10 VII |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2025, September 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 06 | Available. Released 2025, September 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 153 x 72 x 8.3 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 182 g (6.31 oz) | 168 g (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~422 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 91.3 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 16mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0" |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | Wired, PD, QC |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Grey, Smoky Green, Twilight Purple | White, Turquoise, Charcoal |
| Models | XT2435-2 | XQ-FE54, XQZ-CBFE, xqfe54eukcl.gc, xqfe54eukcw.gc, xqfe54eukcb.gc |
| Price | € 157.50 / $ 185.00 | $ 459.99 / £ 329.00 / € 379.00 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 52:04h endurance, 800 cycles | 48:10h endurance, 1400 cycles |
| Energy | Class B | Class B |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class D |
Motorola Moto G55
- Exceptional battery life (52:04h endurance)
- High number of charge cycles (800)
- Potentially strong multi-core performance due to dual A78 cores
- Less efficient chipset (6nm vs 4nm)
- Likely lower display brightness
- Charging speed is standard (30W)
Sony Xperia 10 VII
- Brighter display (1064 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, 4nm)
- Faster charging support (PD, QC)
- Higher charge cycle count (1400)
- Shorter battery endurance (48:10h)
- Potentially less raw multi-core performance
- May be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 10 VII immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1064 nits, significantly exceeding what we'd expect from the Moto G55 (spec not provided, but likely lower). This translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more engaging viewing experience. While the G55's panel technology isn't specified, the Xperia 10 VII's likely utilizes an OLED panel, offering better contrast and color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be similarly minimal on both devices, given their market positioning, but the brightness difference is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but we can infer some differences. Sony's image processing is generally known for its natural color reproduction, while Motorola tends towards more saturated images. The Xperia 10 VII likely benefits from Sony's image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, potentially offering better dynamic range and noise reduction. Without sensor size information, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Sony's history suggests a focus on image quality even in their mid-range devices. We'll assume both phones lack flagship-level camera features like optical image stabilization (OIS) given their price points.
Performance
The chipset choice is a critical distinction. The Moto G55 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm), featuring a dual-core Cortex-A78 setup clocked at 2.5 GHz. The Xperia 10 VII, however, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and potentially less performance throttling under sustained loads. While both CPUs feature Cortex-A78 cores, the Xperia 10 VII's configuration (4x2.4 GHz) and the more efficient chipset architecture should result in smoother performance in demanding applications. The G55's larger A78 core count might offer a slight edge in specific multi-threaded tasks, but the Snapdragon's overall efficiency is likely more impactful for daily use.
Battery Life
Battery life is where the Moto G55 truly shines, boasting an impressive 52:04h endurance and a reported 800 charge cycles. This is significantly longer than the Xperia 10 VII's 48:10h endurance. However, the Xperia 10 VII's active use score of 12:57h provides a more realistic measure of daily usage. The G55's 30W wired charging is adequate, but the Xperia 10 VII supports both PD and QC, potentially allowing for faster charging with compatible adapters. The Xperia 10 VII also claims 1400 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan for the battery itself, despite the lower overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G55 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently find yourself away from power outlets. Buy the Sony Xperia 10 VII if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking, and a phone with a potentially longer software support lifecycle, despite a shorter battery endurance.