The Motorola Moto G55 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The G55 champions exceptional battery endurance, aiming for multi-day use, while the 12 Pro+ prioritizes a premium display experience and faster charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Motorola Moto G55 is the clear winner. Its astounding 52:04h battery endurance significantly outpaces the Realme 12 Pro+. However, if rapid charging and a brighter screen are paramount, the Realme 12 Pro+ offers a compelling alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 06 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 182 g (6.31 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.61µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Forest Grey, Smoky Green, Twilight Purple | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | XT2435-2 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | € 157.50 / $ 185.00 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 52:04h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G55
- Unrivaled battery life (52:04h endurance)
- High charge cycle count (800 cycles)
- Efficient Dimensity 7025 chipset
- Slower 30W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than competitors
Realme 12 Pro+
- Fast 67W charging (50% in 19 min)
- Bright 802 nits display
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:24h)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, compared to the Moto G55 which lacks published brightness data. This makes the 12 Pro+ more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the G55’s panel specifics are unknown, the 12 Pro+'s brightness advantage is substantial. The Realme also likely benefits from a higher contrast ratio, enhancing visual pop. The G55’s display is likely tuned for efficiency to complement its battery focus, potentially at the expense of peak brightness and color vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Moto G55, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and advanced image processing algorithms. The 12 Pro+’s focus on camera features suggests a stronger emphasis on photography, while the G55 likely prioritizes a functional, all-purpose camera experience. The absence of information regarding OIS on the G55 suggests the 12 Pro+ will offer superior low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration (2x Cortex-A78, 6x Cortex-A55), but diverge in chipset and fabrication process. The Realme 12 Pro+ employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), while the Moto G55 uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6nm). The 4nm process of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling during demanding tasks. While the Snapdragon has a slightly lower peak clock speed on its A78 cores (2.40 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), the architectural improvements and process node give it an edge. The G55’s Dimensity 7025 is still a capable performer, but the 12 Pro+ is likely to handle graphically intensive games and multitasking more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G55’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 52:04 hours in testing with 800 charge cycles. This dwarfs the Realme 12 Pro+'s active use score of 13:24 hours. However, the 12 Pro+ compensates with significantly faster charging – 67W wired, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The G55’s 30W charging is considerably slower. This creates a trade-off: the G55 offers multi-day battery life but requires longer charging times, while the 12 Pro+ provides quick top-ups but necessitates more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G55 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and you value battery life above all else. It's ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prefer a vibrant, bright display for media consumption, and you want the convenience of extremely fast 67W charging, even if it means charging more often.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in the Moto G55 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 7025 is a capable chip, Genshin Impact may require reduced graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ is likely to handle the game with higher settings and more stable frame rates due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compare to other fast charging standards?
67W is a very competitive fast charging speed, placing it among the fastest options available in this price range. It's significantly faster than the 30W charging on the Moto G55 and comparable to some flagship devices. The 50% charge in 19 minutes claim is realistic and provides a substantial top-up in a short amount of time.
❓ Is the battery health of the Moto G55 likely to degrade significantly after 800 charge cycles?
Motorola's claim of 800 charge cycles suggests a focus on battery longevity. While some degradation is inevitable, 800 cycles indicate the battery is designed to retain a substantial portion of its capacity even after extended use. This is a significant advantage over phones with lower cycle counts.
