Motorola Moto G53 vs Samsung Galaxy A14 5G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G edges out the Moto G53 thanks to its slightly better battery life and more powerful chipset (depending on region). However, the Moto G53 boasts a brighter display and potentially faster charging in some markets, making it a compelling alternative for those prioritizing screen quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G53 | Samsung Galaxy A14 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | XT2335-2 | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 307886 (v9) GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G53
- Brighter Display (599 nits)
- Potentially Faster Charging (18W in some regions)
- Clean Android Experience
- Good Value
- Less Powerful Processor (Snapdragon 480+)
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- Camera Details Unavailable
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Longer Battery Life (130h Endurance)
- Potentially More Powerful Processor (Exynos 1330 variant)
- Established Brand Reputation
- More Consistent Software Updates
- Lower Display Brightness (519 nits)
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Samsung's One UI (can be polarizing)
Display Comparison
The Moto G53 takes the lead in display brightness, measuring 599 nits compared to the A14 5G's 519 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1746:1 vs 1334:1), the G53's higher brightness will be noticeable in outdoor conditions. The A14 5G's display is still good, but the G53 offers a more visually striking experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar between the two, as detailed camera specs are missing. Both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, suggesting a focus on general-purpose photography rather than advanced features. Real-world testing would be needed to determine a clear winner.
Performance
Performance is a bit more complex. The Moto G53 uses a Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the A14 5G has either an Exynos 1330 or Dimensity 700 depending on the region. The Exynos 1330 generally offers superior performance compared to the Snapdragon 480+, making the A14 5G the faster option in most scenarios. The Dimensity 700 variant is comparable to the Snapdragon 480+.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G has a slight edge in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 130 hours compared to the Moto G53's 123 hours. This translates to slightly longer usage between charges, a valuable asset for budget-conscious users.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G53 is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant display and potentially faster charging (depending on region) and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is a better choice for those seeking longer battery life, a more established brand, and a generally smoother performance experience, especially with the Exynos 1330 variant.