Motorola Moto G53 vs Moto G72: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G72 edges out the G53 thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and the generally more powerful Helio G99 chipset. While the G53 boasts a slightly better contrast ratio, the G72's overall performance and charging speed make it the more appealing option for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G53 | Motorola Moto G72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2022, September 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White |
| Models | XT2335-2 | XT2255-1 |
| Price | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 383317 (v9) GeekBench: 1842 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G53
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Efficient chipset (potentially longer battery life in some scenarios)
- Reverse wired charging
- Lower peak brightness
- Slower charging speed
- Snapdragon 480+ 5G may not be as powerful as the G99
Motorola Moto G72
- Significantly brighter display
- Faster 33W charging
- More powerful Helio G99 chipset
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio is misleading
- Battery life may be slightly shorter due to brighter screen
Display Comparison
The Moto G72 takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1015 nits, significantly higher than the G53's 599 nits. While the G53 has a very impressive 1746:1 contrast ratio (though nominal), the G72's brightness advantage makes it much easier to view in direct sunlight. The G72 also claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a marketing term and not a measurable value.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar between the two, as detailed specifications are missing. Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and sensor quality, which are difficult to assess without detailed testing. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but potential struggles in low light.
Performance
The Moto G72's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset generally outperforms the G53's Snapdragon 480+ 5G. The G99's Cortex-A76 cores provide a noticeable boost in CPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. Both phones have octa-core processors, but the G72's architecture is more efficient for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life with an endurance rating of around 121-123 hours. However, the Moto G72's 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the G53's slower 10W (International) or 18W (China/LATAM) charging. This means the G72 can be fully charged much faster.
Buying Guide
The Moto G53 is ideal for users prioritizing a high contrast display and a slightly more efficient chipset for extended battery life. The Moto G72 is a better fit for those who value a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, faster charging, and a more responsive overall experience.