Motorola Moto G53 vs Moto G62 5G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G53 edges out the G62 5G thanks to its brighter display and slightly better endurance rating. While both share the same chipset, the G53's charging speed (in some regions) and overall screen performance give it a slight advantage for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G53 | Motorola Moto G62 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2022, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue |
| Models | XT2335-2 | - |
| Price | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 | About 110 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G53
- Brighter Display
- Slightly Better Battery Life
- Potentially Faster Charging (region dependent)
- Good Value
- Charging speed varies by region
- Camera performance may be average
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Reliable Performance
- Compact Design
- Good Value
- Slightly Dimmer Display
- Slower Charging
- Camera performance may be average
Display Comparison
The Moto G53 boasts a measured peak brightness of 599 nits compared to the G62 5G's 552 nits, resulting in a noticeably brighter and more visible screen, especially outdoors. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (1746:1 vs 1571:1), ensuring deep blacks and vibrant colors. The G53's slightly higher brightness gives it a clear edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be comparable given the shared chipset. Both phones feature a primary camera setup, but specific megapixel counts and additional lenses (like ultrawide or macro) may differ depending on the region. Image quality in good lighting should be decent, but low-light performance might be a weak point for both.
Performance
Both phones utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset, meaning performance will be largely similar for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Don't expect flagship-level speeds, but both should handle social media, browsing, and basic apps without issue. RAM and storage configurations will vary by region, so check the specs carefully.
Battery Life
The Moto G53 has an endurance rating of 123h, slightly surpassing the G62 5G's 122h. While the difference is minimal, it suggests the G53 might offer slightly longer battery life under typical usage. Charging speeds vary; the G53 has 18W wired charging in some regions (China, LATAM) and 10W in others, while the G62 5G is limited to 15W.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G53 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display and extended battery life. It's a great choice for media consumption and everyday tasks. The Moto G62 5G is a solid alternative, particularly if you find it at a lower price, offering a reliable experience with a slightly more compact design.