Motorola Moto G53 vs Moto G51 5G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G53 edges out the G51 5G thanks to its slightly brighter display and potentially faster charging (depending on region). Both offer similar performance and battery life, making the G53 a marginally better choice for most users seeking a budget 5G experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G53 | Motorola Moto G51 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe/Asia |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe/Asia |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2021, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2021, December 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - Global or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - China only |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired (China, LATAM) 10W wired (International) Reverse wired | 20W wired (India) 10W wired (Global) |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue |
| Models | XT2335-2 | XT2171-2, XT2171-1 |
| Price | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 | About 210 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 123h | Endurance rating 124h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1634:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 314195 (v9) GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 302859 (v9) GeekBench: 1696 (v5.1) GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G53
- Slightly brighter display
- Potentially faster charging (region dependent)
- Modern design
- Charging speed varies by region
- Camera performance unknown
Motorola Moto G51 5G
- Reliable Motorola experience
- Solid battery life
- Potentially faster charging (India)
- Slightly dimmer display
- Charging speed varies by region
- Camera performance unknown
Display Comparison
The Moto G53 boasts a slightly higher contrast ratio (1746:1 vs 1634:1) and a marginally brighter display (599 nits vs 595 nits). While the difference is subtle, the G53's display offers a bit more vibrancy and visibility in bright conditions. Both phones likely feature an FHD+ resolution and a similar refresh rate (likely 120Hz, based on typical Moto G series specs).
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively assess without detailed testing. Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, suggesting a standard camera setup. Expect a primary sensor, likely a 50MP sensor based on typical Moto G series specs, and potentially ultrawide and macro lenses. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing and sensor size.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset and Octa-core CPU. Expect similar performance in everyday tasks, app usage, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance, but both should handle typical usage without significant issues. RAM and storage configurations will likely vary by region.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar, with both phones achieving an endurance rating of 123-124 hours. This suggests comparable battery capacity (likely around 5000mAh) and efficient power management. Charging speeds differ; the G53 offers 18W (China/LATAM) or 10W (International) wired charging, while the G51 5G offers 20W (India) or 10W (Global) wired charging. The G53's faster charging (in some regions) is a slight advantage.
Buying Guide
The Moto G53 is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly better display and potentially faster charging. The Moto G51 5G is a great option for those seeking a reliable budget 5G phone with a solid battery and a familiar Motorola experience, especially if the 20W charging is available in your region.