Motorola consistently delivers excellent value in the budget smartphone market. The Moto G53 and Moto G32 are two compelling options, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G53 edges out the G32 thanks to its 5G connectivity, brighter display, and potentially better performance. However, the G32’s faster charging and more established chipset might appeal to some. Ultimately, the G53 offers a more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EMEA & AP, China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - EMEA & AP | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - EMEA & AP | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA - China | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2022, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, August 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| | Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
or
16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired (China, LATAM)
10W wired (International)
Reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ink Blue, Arctic Silver, Pale Pink | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold |
| Models | XT2335-2 | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 |
| Price | $ 295.00 / £ 143.15 | ₹ 8,990 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 123h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1746:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.0 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 314195 (v9)
GeekBench: 1594 (v5.1), 1797 (v6.0)
GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G53
- 5G Connectivity
- Brighter Display
- Potentially Better Performance
- High Endurance Rating
- Slower Charging (International)
- Camera Details Limited
Motorola Moto G32
- Faster 30W Charging
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 Chipset
- Established 4G Performance
- No 5G
- Likely Less Bright Display
- Potentially Lower Performance
Display Comparison
The Moto G53 boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 599 nits compared to the G32's likely lower brightness (typical budget phone range). The 1746:1 contrast ratio on the G53 also suggests richer colors and deeper blacks. Both likely feature an FHD+ resolution, offering sharp visuals, but the G53's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The G53 likely has a more modern image processing pipeline due to its newer chipset. Expect similar camera quality in good lighting conditions, but the G53 might offer slightly better low-light performance and video stabilization. Further testing is needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Snapdragon 480+ 5G in the Moto G53 offers a performance boost over the Snapdragon 680 4G in the Moto G32. While both are octa-core processors, the 480+ generally handles multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly. The G53's 8nm process also contributes to potentially better power efficiency. However, real-world performance will depend on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Moto G53's endurance rating of 123h is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent battery life. The Moto G32, while not explicitly stated, likely offers good battery life as well, but the G53's rating indicates a clear advantage. The G32's 30W charging is a significant advantage over the G53's slower wired charging (10W internationally, 18W in China/LATAM).
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G53 is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity, a vibrant display, and a slightly more powerful processor. The Moto G32 is a great choice for those prioritizing fast charging and a reliable 4G experience, especially if 5G isn't a necessity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Moto G53 worth the extra cost over the G32?
If 5G connectivity and a brighter display are important to you, the Moto G53 is likely worth the extra investment. However, if fast charging is your top priority and you don't need 5G, the G32 remains a solid choice.
❓ What are the camera specs for each phone?
Specific camera details are currently unavailable. Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but further testing is required to determine their actual performance.
