The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Moto G52 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an attractive price point, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 edges out the Moto G52 thanks to its faster charging, slightly brighter display, and generally more polished software experience. While both share the same Snapdragon 680 chipset, the Redmi Note 11 provides a more complete package for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 12 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 20 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 470 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G52
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially better low-light camera performance
- Sleek design
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Less feature-rich software
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Faster charging (33W)
- Brighter display (736 nits)
- Excellent battery life (126h endurance)
- Feature-rich MIUI software
- MIUI software can be cluttered
- Camera processing may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch FHD+ display, but the Redmi Note 11 boasts a measured peak brightness of 736 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Moto G52's display is still good, but the Redmi Note 11 has a noticeable advantage here. The Redmi Note 11 also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G52 is rumored to have a slightly better main camera sensor, potentially resulting in better image quality in low-light conditions. However, the Redmi Note 11's camera software and processing algorithms are generally considered to be more refined, leading to more consistent results. Both phones offer decent camera capabilities for their price range.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset and Octa-core CPU, performance between the two phones will be very similar for everyday tasks. Expect smooth navigation, app loading, and multitasking. However, the Redmi Note 11's software optimizations might provide a slightly snappier feel.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 126 hours is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer battery life than the Moto G52. While the Moto G52 offers 30W charging, the Redmi Note 11 supports 33W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 protocols, allowing for faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G52 is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and potentially a slightly better camera in certain lighting conditions. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a better choice for those who value fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more feature-rich software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a significantly better endurance rating (126h) compared to the Moto G52, indicating longer battery life.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 chipset good enough for gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is suitable for casual gaming. While it won't handle demanding titles at high settings, it can provide a decent gaming experience for less intensive games.
