Motorola Moto G51 5G vs Moto G62 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G62 5G edges out the G51 5G thanks to its slightly faster charging and potentially better display quality (though both are good). Both offer excellent battery life and similar performance, making the choice largely dependent on charging speed and display preference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G51 5G | Motorola Moto G62 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe, Asia, Saudi Arabia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe/Asia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe/Asia | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | 1, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - LATAM, Brazil | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 03 | 2022, June 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 170.5 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm (6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 161.8 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - Global or 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm - China only | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD/Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired (India) 10W wired (Global) | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Indigo Blue, Bright Silver, Aqua Blue | Midnight Gray, Frosted Blue |
| Models | XT2171-2, XT2171-1 | - |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 124h | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1634:1 | Contrast ratio: 1571:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -25.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 302859 (v9) GeekBench: 1696 (v5.1) GFXBench: 26fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 303072 (v9) GeekBench: 1697 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G51 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- High contrast ratio
- Competitive price
- Slower charging speed (Global version)
- Camera slightly less impressive than G62 5G
Motorola Moto G62 5G
- Faster charging speed
- Potentially better camera performance
- Slightly more refined display
- Good value for money
- Slightly lower contrast ratio than G51 5G
- Battery life marginally lower than G51 5G
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large, vibrant displays, but the G51 5G boasts a slightly higher contrast ratio (1634:1 vs 1571:1). The G51 5G also has a higher peak brightness (595 nits) than the G62 5G (552 nits), potentially offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Both utilize an AMOLED panel, providing excellent color reproduction and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area where differences can emerge. While both are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the G62 5G often features a slightly more advanced main camera sensor and image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The G51 5G's camera is still capable, but the G62 5G generally holds a slight advantage. Both typically include ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
Under the hood, both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G chipset and octa-core CPU. Expect similar performance for everyday tasks, browsing, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance, but they're perfectly capable for their price range. RAM and storage configurations are generally similar across both models, typically offering 4GB/6GB RAM and 64GB/128GB storage.
Battery Life
Battery life is a strong point for both phones. Both achieve an impressive endurance rating of around 122-124 hours. However, the G62 5G has a significant advantage in charging speed, supporting 15W wired charging compared to the G51 5G's 10W (Global) or 20W (India) charging. This means the G62 5G will recharge considerably faster.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G51 5G is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a vibrant display, especially if charging speed isn't a major concern. The Motorola Moto G62 5G is a better choice for those who value faster charging and potentially a slightly more refined display experience.