Motorola Moto G50 vs Realme 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 720G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Moto G50’s Snapdragon 480, and the blazing-fast 50W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Moto G50 boasts superior battery endurance, the Realme 8 Pro’s overall package offers a more refined user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G50 | Realme 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 25 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.9 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | XT2137-1, XT2137-2 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 133h | Endurance rating 116h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1819:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.0 LUFS (Good) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 286916 (v9) GeekBench: 1620 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 286666 (v8) GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G50
- Exceptional battery life (133h endurance)
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Decent display brightness (362 nits)
- Slower Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Slow 15W charging
- Basic camera system (details unknown)
Realme 8 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Ultra-fast 50W charging (0-100% in 47 min)
- Potentially better camera system (based on marketing)
- Shorter battery life (116h endurance)
- Display contrast ratio is nominally 'Infinite'
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize 8nm chipsets, but the display experience differs. The Realme 8 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical IPS panel, while the Moto G50’s measured 1819:1 contrast ratio confirms a similar IPS LCD. However, the Moto G50’s 362 nits of max brightness is a measurable advantage, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Neither phone specifies high refresh rates, suggesting a standard 60Hz experience. The lack of detailed color accuracy data makes it difficult to assess which display is more color-accurate, but both are likely to be adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The Realme 8 Pro’s marketing often highlights its 108MP main sensor (not present in the provided data, but a key feature), suggesting a more detailed and versatile camera system. The Moto G50’s camera performance is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Realme 8 Pro’s higher-tier chipset likely enables more sophisticated image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (SM7125) represents a clear step up in processing power compared to the Moto G50’s Snapdragon 480 (SM4350). The 720G features Kryo 465 Gold cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, versus the 480’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. While both chipsets are 8nm, the architectural differences favor the 720G. The Moto G50’s focus is on 5G connectivity at a lower price point, sacrificing raw processing power. Both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the Realme 8 Pro’s superior chipset will be the primary performance differentiator.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G50 boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance with a rating of 133 hours, compared to the Realme 8 Pro’s 116 hours. However, this comes at the cost of charging speed. The Moto G50’s 15W wired charging is considerably slower than the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging, which can reach 50% in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. This means the Realme 8 Pro can quickly top up its battery when needed, mitigating the impact of its slightly smaller capacity. The trade-off is clear: long-lasting battery versus rapid recharging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G50 if you prioritize maximizing battery life above all else and frequently find yourself away from power outlets. Its 133-hour endurance rating is a significant advantage for heavy users. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging speeds, and a more versatile camera system, even if it means sacrificing some battery longevity.