Motorola Moto G50 vs Nokia X20: A Deep Dive into the Snapdragon 480 Experience
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia X20 edges out the Moto G50 due to its faster 18W charging. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 480 processor, the slightly quicker power-up time and Nokia’s generally cleaner software experience provide a more refined daily usage experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G50 | Nokia X20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 25 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Available. Released 2021, May 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.9 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4470 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Midnight Sun, Nordic Blue |
| Models | XT2137-1, XT2137-2 | TA-1341, TA-1344 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 133h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1819:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.0 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 286916 (v9) GeekBench: 1620 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G50
- Exceptional 133-hour battery endurance
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Snapdragon 480 5G chipset provides adequate performance
- Slow 15W charging
- Display brightness may be insufficient in direct sunlight
- Limited camera details
Nokia X20
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Nokia's Android One)
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Battery endurance likely lower than Moto G50
- Limited camera details
- Display specifications largely unknown
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G50 features a display capable of 362 nits of peak brightness, paired with a 1819:1 contrast ratio. While adequate for indoor use, this brightness level may struggle in direct sunlight. The Nokia X20’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it’s likely comparable, potentially slightly lower. The contrast ratio on the G50, while nominal, suggests a standard IPS panel. Neither phone is expected to offer high-end display features like OLED or high refresh rates, focusing instead on affordability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones utilize budget-friendly camera modules. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography or offer advanced features like 4K video recording. Focusing on the main sensor resolution is key; larger sensors generally capture more light and detail.
Performance
Both the Moto G50 and Nokia X20 are powered by the Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 cores. This means performance will be virtually identical in most tasks, including everyday app usage and light gaming. The 8nm process node offers a reasonable balance between performance and power efficiency. RAM specifications are not provided, but are crucial for multitasking; a larger RAM capacity would benefit both devices. Thermal throttling is unlikely to be a major concern with this chipset.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G50 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 133 hours, indicating excellent battery life. This is coupled with 15W wired charging. The Nokia X20, on the other hand, supports 18W wired charging, offering a faster recharge rate. While the Nokia X20’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed partially offsets any potential difference in mAh. The G50’s longer endurance is ideal for users who prioritize longevity, while the X20’s faster charging is better for those who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G50 if you prioritize maximum battery endurance and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Its 133-hour endurance rating is a significant advantage for users who frequently find themselves away from a power outlet. Buy the Nokia X20 if you value faster charging and a potentially more streamlined software experience, even if it means slightly less overall battery life.