Motorola Moto G 5G Plus vs. Moto G50: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is the better choice. While the G50 boasts impressive battery endurance, the G 5G Plus’s significantly brighter display (543 nits vs 362 nits) and more capable Snapdragon 765 chipset provide a smoother, more responsive experience that justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G50 | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 25 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 26 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 74.9 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.8 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer (market dependant) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Steel Gray, Aqua Green | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | XT2137-1, XT2137-2 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 133h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1819:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -28.0 LUFS (Good) | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 286916 (v9) GeekBench: 1620 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G50
- Exceptional battery life (133h endurance)
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Dimmer display (362 nits)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 processor
- Slower 15W charging
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 processor
- Faster 20W charging
- Shorter battery life (114h endurance)
- Higher price compared to the G50
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Moto G 5G Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 543 nits compared to the G50’s 362 nits. This makes the G 5G Plus far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While both displays have a contrast ratio around 1200:1 to 1800:1, the higher brightness of the G 5G Plus translates to a more vivid and engaging viewing experience. The G50's lower brightness may require users to increase brightness, impacting battery life. Neither phone specifies refresh rates, suggesting standard 60Hz panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are absent. Given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the G 5G Plus has a more sophisticated camera system. The Snapdragon 765’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 480’s, resulting in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. While both likely include a standard and ultrawide lens, the G 5G Plus is more likely to offer features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and smoother videos. The lack of detail makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the chipset advantage favors the G 5G Plus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Moto G 5G Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm), featuring a Kryo 475 Prime core for peak performance, alongside Gold and Silver cores for efficiency. The Moto G50, on the other hand, is equipped with the Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). While the 8nm process is more efficient, the 765’s superior core architecture and higher clock speeds (2.3 GHz vs 2.0 GHz) deliver noticeably faster performance in demanding tasks and gaming. The G 5G Plus will handle multitasking and graphically intensive apps with greater ease. The G50 is adequate for basic tasks, but may exhibit lag with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Moto G50 claims an impressive endurance rating of 133 hours, exceeding the G 5G Plus’s 114 hours. This suggests the G50’s Snapdragon 480 and potentially a larger battery (spec not provided) contribute to longer runtimes. However, the G 5G Plus compensates with faster 20W wired charging, compared to the G50’s 15W charging. While the G50 will last longer on a single charge, the G 5G Plus can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. The difference in charging speed is significant, potentially saving users valuable time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G50 if you prioritize all-day battery life above all else and are on a very tight budget. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption, smoother performance for multitasking and light gaming, and faster charging speeds. This phone is better suited for users who want a more versatile and enjoyable daily experience.