The Motorola Moto G41 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The G41 focuses on a balance of features, while the 11R prioritizes processing power with a more modern chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and improved efficiency over the Moto G41’s Helio G85. While the G41 offers 30W charging, the 11R’s superior processor outweighs this benefit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 26, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM, Brazil | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 28 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Black, Pearl Gold | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | XT2167-2 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Motorola Moto G41
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially more readily available in certain markets
- Clean Motorola software experience (typically)
- Less powerful Helio G85 chipset
- 12nm process leads to lower efficiency
- Likely to exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- 7nm process for better thermal management
- Smoother multitasking and gaming performance
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be divisive
- May have more bloatware pre-installed
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The key difference lies under the hood: processing power impacts UI smoothness, which indirectly affects display experience. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the Redmi Note 11R’s more powerful chipset will contribute to a more fluid user interface and faster app loading times, enhancing the perceived quality of the display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature similar budget-oriented camera setups. The Redmi Note 11R’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), integrated within the Dimensity 700, likely provides better image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in sharper images and improved low-light performance. The G41’s Helio G85 has a less capable ISP. The presence of a larger main sensor (if applicable, and a common trend) on either device would further enhance image quality, but this information is unavailable.
Performance
The core differentiator between these two phones is their chipset. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto G41’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The 7nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, translating to better sustained performance and less thermal throttling. The Dimensity 700’s CPU, featuring 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, is also more powerful than the G41’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This means faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi Note 11R. The G41 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Moto G41’s 30W wired charging is a clear advantage on paper, potentially allowing for faster top-ups compared to the Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency means the Redmi Note 11R will likely consume less power during typical usage. This could offset the slower charging speed, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The 7nm process contributes to lower power draw, extending the time between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G41 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and a more efficient processor that will likely hold up better over time. The 11R is the clear choice for users who anticipate demanding applications or want a phone that feels responsive for longer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won’t deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience compared to the Moto G41’s Helio G85, which may struggle with consistent performance.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G41’s 30W charging really make a difference in daily use?
While 30W charging is faster than 18W, the difference in real-world charging times may not be as dramatic as it seems. The Redmi Note 11R’s more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset consumes less power, potentially reducing the frequency of charging. Therefore, the convenience of faster charging is somewhat offset by the 11R’s improved power management.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Motorola has historically been slower to roll out major Android updates compared to Xiaomi. While both brands offer security patches, Xiaomi generally provides more frequent and timely software updates for its Redmi Note series, giving the 11R a slight edge in long-term software support.
