Poco X4 Pro 5G vs. Motorola Moto G41: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. While the Moto G41 offers a respectable experience, the Poco X4 Pro 5G delivers more future-proofing and a smoother overall user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G41 | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Europe | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Europe | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/150 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 26, 28, 40, 66 - LATAM, Brazil | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 28 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Black, Pearl Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | XT2167-2 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G41
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Clean and simple software experience (typical of Motorola).
- Decent battery endurance (119h rating).
- Less powerful processor (Helio G85).
- Slower charging speed (30W).
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster and more efficient processor (Snapdragon 695 5G).
- Significantly faster charging (67W with PD3.0/QC3).
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be more feature-rich (and potentially bloated) than Motorola’s.
- Potential for more pre-installed apps.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both displays are adequate for everyday use, but likely won't excel in direct sunlight. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger size (implied by its overall dimensions) likely translates to a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of high refresh rate information on both suggests a standard 60Hz panel, which is common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are scarce. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system. The inclusion of features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – common in Poco’s higher-end models – is plausible, offering improved image quality in low-light conditions. The Moto G41 likely relies on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The absence of detail suggests neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely has a slight advantage.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) offers a clear advantage over the Motorola Moto G41’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process node is significantly more efficient, leading to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Poco X4 Pro 5G. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and process node give the Snapdragon a substantial edge.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer. Reaching 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes significantly reduces downtime. The Moto G41’s 30W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to fully replenish the battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Poco X4 Pro 5G effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G41 if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience and are less concerned with demanding tasks or 5G connectivity. It’s a good fit for users who primarily browse, message, and occasionally take photos. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster performance, 5G capabilities, and significantly quicker charging. This phone is ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, streaming video, and want a device that can keep up with a more demanding lifestyle.