Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) vs Motorola Moto G40 Fusion: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner, thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset and 67W charging. However, the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion offers a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users who value efficiency and a more balanced experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G40 Fusion | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 01 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7 (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | PANV0001IN, PANV0005IN, PANV0009IN | - |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Balanced feature set
- Slower charging speed (20W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 1100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Likely superior display quality (AMOLED)
- Potentially higher price
- Dimensity 1100 may run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Redmi Note 10 Pro historically features AMOLED panels, offering superior contrast and color vibrancy compared to the Moto G40 Fusion’s likely LCD. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display technology will benefit content consumers. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s AMOLED panel will provide a more immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy is difficult to assess without specific data, but Xiaomi typically calibrates its displays for reasonably accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, we can infer that the Redmi Note 10 Pro likely features a higher resolution main sensor and potentially more advanced image processing capabilities, aligning with Xiaomi’s camera-focused marketing. The Dimensity 1100’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more capable than the Snapdragon 732G’s, enabling features like faster image capture and improved low-light performance. While both phones likely include multiple lenses, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s image quality will likely be superior, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Moto G40 Fusion will likely offer a more basic camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm), featuring four high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, alongside four efficiency cores. This architecture provides a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The Snapdragon 732G utilizes a more traditional Kryo 470 core configuration, with two performance cores at 2.3 GHz and six efficiency cores at 1.8 GHz. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 also contributes to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained load, making it the superior choice for gamers and power users. The Redmi Note 10 Pro will exhibit faster app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Moto G40 Fusion’s 20W charging, which will take considerably longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 10 Pro effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Redmi Note 10 Pro also supports PD3.0, offering wider compatibility with chargers. The Moto G40 Fusion supports QC4, but the charging speed difference is substantial.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and appreciate a more conservative approach to power consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means potentially shorter battery life during intensive use.