The Motorola Moto G40 Fusion and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a strong value proposition, they take distinctly different approaches. The G40 Fusion prioritizes efficiency with the Snapdragon 732G, while the X3 Pro opts for outright performance with the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 860. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a significant performance uplift, particularly for gaming, and the 33W fast charging is a clear advantage. While the Moto G40 Fusion offers respectable efficiency, the X3 Pro’s power outweighs its slightly less refined power management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 01 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7 (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | PANV0001IN, PANV0005IN, PANV0009IN | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
- Potentially better power efficiency due to the 8nm process.
- Clean Motorola software experience (assumed based on brand reputation).
- Competitive price point (likely).
- Significantly less powerful processor compared to the X3 Pro.
- Slower charging speed (20W vs 33W).
- Limited display details available.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 860 processor for gaming and demanding tasks.
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Likely better camera performance due to a more powerful ISP.
- Potentially less battery efficiency compared to the G40 Fusion.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be more resource-intensive.
- May run warmer under heavy load.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the G40 Fusion. The X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond contrast, benefits from the chipset’s ability to drive higher refresh rates smoothly. Without further data on the G40 Fusion’s panel, the X3 Pro likely offers a more vibrant and fluid visual experience, especially during gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the X3 Pro’s focus on performance, it’s reasonable to assume it benefits from a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 860, potentially leading to better image quality and faster processing times. The G40 Fusion’s camera system likely prioritizes cost-effectiveness over cutting-edge features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significant step up from the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core, alongside three additional Gold cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Silver cores at 1.78 GHz, compared to the 732G’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. This translates to substantially faster CPU and GPU performance on the X3 Pro, making it better suited for demanding games and multitasking. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better thermal headroom, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the 8nm process of the 732G is more efficient, the architectural advantages of the 860 outweigh this benefit.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 59% in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, is a substantial advantage over the Moto G40 Fusion’s 20W charging with QC4 support. This faster charging allows the X3 Pro to quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime, even if the overall battery capacity is not specified.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion if you prioritize all-day battery life and a smooth, responsive experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you are a mobile gamer, frequently engage in demanding applications, or value faster charging speeds and a more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 is a powerful chip, it's based on an older architecture. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management features, but sustained, high-intensity gaming may lead to some throttling to prevent overheating. However, the 7nm process node and the phone's cooling system are generally effective at managing temperatures.
❓ Is the 20W charging on the Moto G40 Fusion slow compared to the competition?
Yes, 20W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro and many other phones in this price range. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Moto G40 Fusion, potentially exceeding 2 hours.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
The Snapdragon 860 is capable of driving displays at 120Hz, and the Poco X3 Pro’s display supports this. However, achieving consistently high frame rates in demanding games will depend on the game’s optimization and graphics settings. Expect to adjust settings for optimal performance.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Moto G40 Fusion and the Poco X3 Pro?
Motorola typically offers a near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware, providing a clean and responsive user interface. Xiaomi’s MIUI, on the other hand, is heavily customized with additional features and pre-installed apps. While MIUI offers more customization options, it can also be more resource-intensive and may include unwanted apps.
