Motorola Moto G40 Fusion vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management, while the 800 nit display offers a significantly brighter and more usable outdoor experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G40 Fusion | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 01 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7 (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | PANV0001IN, PANV0005IN, PANV0009IN | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
- Lower price point makes it accessible.
- Decent performance for everyday tasks.
- QC4 support offers fast charging compatibility.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the A52s 5G.
- Likely inferior display quality.
- Limited camera details suggest a less capable system.
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 778G.
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- Faster 25W charging.
- Higher price compared to the Moto G40 Fusion.
- Potential for thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by 6nm process).
- Software updates may be less frequent than Motorola.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a clear advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 800 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a scenario where the Moto G40 Fusion’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a lower peak brightness. While the Galaxy A52s 5G’s contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite (nominal)', this is typical of OLED panels and indicates deep blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of detailed display specs for the Moto G40 Fusion suggests a more standard LCD panel, likely with lower color accuracy and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Galaxy A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger main sensor, though specifics are unavailable. The Moto G40 Fusion’s camera system is likely more focused on affordability, potentially sacrificing low-light performance and dynamic range. Without detailed specs, it’s difficult to assess the quality gap, but Samsung’s track record suggests a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G features the Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). The 778G’s 6nm fabrication process is more efficient, leading to lower power consumption and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The CPU architecture also differs; the A52s 5G employs a Cortex-A78 prime core alongside A78 performance cores, offering a significant uplift in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Kryo 470 cores in the Moto G40 Fusion. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Moto G40 Fusion’s unspecified mAh capacity. However, the Galaxy A52s 5G supports 25W wired charging, compared to the Moto G40 Fusion’s 20W charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) compatibility. This faster charging speed allows the A52s 5G to replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. The more efficient Snapdragon 778G also contributes to better battery management.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion if you prioritize a lower upfront cost and are comfortable with a slightly less refined experience. It's a solid option for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance, a brighter display, and a more polished overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more. This phone is ideal for gamers, content creators, and users who demand responsiveness.