Motorola Moto G40 Fusion vs OnePlus Nord CE 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smoother overall experience and faster charging, the OnePlus Nord CE 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset offers a slight performance edge, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Moto G40 Fusion remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G40 Fusion | OnePlus Nord CE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2021, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 01 | Available. Released 2021, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 159.2 x 73.5 x 7.9 mm (6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 170 g (6.00 oz) |
| Water repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~410 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7 (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 30W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Blue Void, Charkoal Ink, Silver Ray |
| Models | PANV0001IN, PANV0005IN, PANV0009IN | EB2101, EB2103 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.9 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 318672 (v8) | 391770 (v9) GeekBench: 1812 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (117h endurance)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G provides adequate performance for everyday tasks
- Slower 20W charging
- Display brightness and technology are unknown, potentially inferior
- Potentially less refined camera experience
OnePlus Nord CE 5G
- Faster 30W charging (70% in 30 min)
- Brighter 607 nit display
- More modern Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Higher price compared to the Moto G40 Fusion
- Battery life is similar despite faster charging
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord CE 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 607 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Moto G40 Fusion. This difference translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED/AMOLED panels), the higher brightness of the Nord CE 5G provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The lack of information regarding the Moto G40 Fusion’s panel technology (LCD vs. OLED) and refresh rate leaves a significant question mark regarding its overall display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning of OnePlus suggests a more refined image processing pipeline, potentially resulting in more consistent and pleasing photos. The Moto G40 Fusion likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience at a lower price point. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, as image quality is typically poor.
Performance
Both phones utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets built on an 8nm process, but the Nord CE 5G’s Snapdragon 750G represents a step up from the Moto G40 Fusion’s Snapdragon 732G. The 750G features Kryo 570 cores (2x2.2 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz) versus the 732G’s Kryo 470 cores (2x2.3 GHz + 6x1.8 GHz). While the 732G has a slightly higher peak clock speed, the 750G’s newer architecture and integrated 5G modem provide a more modern and efficient platform. This translates to a smoother experience in 5G-connected areas and potentially better sustained performance during gaming. The RAM configuration is not specified for either device, but LPDDR4X is likely, with the Nord CE 5G potentially benefitting from faster RAM options.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion and OnePlus Nord CE 5G achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities differ significantly. The Nord CE 5G supports 30W wired charging, achieving 70% charge in just 30 minutes, while the Moto G40 Fusion is limited to 20W charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) compatibility. This faster charging speed on the Nord CE 5G is a substantial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G40 Fusion if you need a highly affordable 5G phone and prioritize maximizing value for your money. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily rely on demanding games or intensive multitasking. Buy the OnePlus Nord CE 5G if you prefer a more responsive user experience, faster charging speeds, and a slightly brighter display, even if it comes at a higher price point. This phone is better suited for users who frequently game or stream content.