Motorola consistently delivers solid budget smartphones, and the G40 Fusion and G52 are prime examples. But which one offers the best value for your money? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, features, and performance to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G40 Fusion takes the performance crown thanks to its Snapdragon 732G chipset. However, the G52 boasts a smoother display and faster charging. If raw power is your priority, the G40 Fusion wins; otherwise, the G52 offers a more refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 20 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, May 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 169.6 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10 | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7 (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired, QC4 | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Gray, Frosted Champagne | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | PANV0001IN, PANV0005IN, PANV0009IN | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.20 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola Moto G40 Fusion
- Superior Performance
- Larger Battery Capacity
- Generally more affordable
- IPS LCD Display
- Slower Charging
- Less refined design
Motorola Moto G52
- Vibrant AMOLED Display
- Faster Charging
- More streamlined software experience
- Lower Performance
- Smaller Battery Capacity
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Moto G52 features an AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling. The G40 Fusion has an IPS LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate, which is still good but lacks the contrast and color accuracy of the AMOLED panel. The G52's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The G40 Fusion typically has a higher resolution main sensor (50MP vs 50MP), potentially capturing more detail. The G52 often features improved image processing and low-light performance due to software optimizations. Real-world camera performance is fairly close, but the G52's image processing often results in more pleasing photos.
Performance
The Snapdragon 732G in the G40 Fusion is significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 680 in the G52. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The G40 Fusion handles demanding games with ease, while the G52 might struggle with more graphically intensive titles.
Battery Life
The G40 Fusion generally has a larger battery capacity (6000mAh vs 5000mAh), providing longer battery life. However, the G52's 30W charging is faster than the G40 Fusion's 20W charging, allowing it to recharge quicker.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G40 Fusion is ideal for users who prioritize performance and gaming on a budget. The Moto G52 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more streamlined user experience, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Moto G40 Fusion is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset.
❓ Is the Moto G52's AMOLED display worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize a vibrant and smooth display experience, then yes, the AMOLED display on the Moto G52 is worth the extra cost.
