Motorola Moto G35 vs Honor X9b: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Motorola Moto G35 is the clear winner, boasting an impressive 48:27h endurance. However, the Honor X9b’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset and 35W charging provide a more responsive experience and quicker top-ups, making it ideal for those who value speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G35 | Honor X9b |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 - ЕМЕА | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - ЕМЕА | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 25 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76 x 7.8 mm (6.55 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 191 g (6.63 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T760 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 35W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Leaf Green, Guava Red, Midnight Black, Sage Green | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | XT2433-5 | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | $ 135.00 / C$ 199.99 / £ 88.99 / € 106.43 / ₹ 10,250 | About 970 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:27h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G35
- Exceptional battery life (48:27h endurance)
- Potentially lower price point
- 1000 charge cycles promise long-term battery health
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely less refined camera experience
Honor X9b
- More powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Faster 35W charging with reverse wired charging
- Potentially better camera performance
- Shorter battery life compared to Moto G35
- Potentially higher price point
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The Honor X9b likely benefits from a more recent panel generation, potentially offering slightly improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rate support on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a detailed camera comparison is impossible. However, the chipset difference suggests the Honor X9b will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. The X9b’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is designed to handle more complex computational photography algorithms. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the X9b is likely to offer a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X9b’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Motorola Moto G35’s Unisoc T760 (6nm). The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores, which offer a substantial performance advantage over the G35’s Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency, meaning the X9b should run cooler and maintain performance for longer under sustained load. While both are octa-core CPUs, the X9b’s configuration (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is geared towards more demanding tasks than the G35’s (1x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x Cortex-A76 & 4x Cortex-A55).
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G35 dominates in battery endurance with a reported 48:27h of usage. This is a direct result of the less power-hungry Unisoc T760 chipset and likely a larger battery capacity (though not specified). The Honor X9b compensates with 35W wired charging, a significant upgrade over the G35’s 18W charging. This translates to substantially faster 0-100% charge times. The X9b also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the G35, allowing it to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G35 if you need exceptional battery life and are willing to trade off some processing power. This phone is perfect for users who frequently travel, rely heavily on their phone throughout the day, or simply dislike the anxiety of constantly searching for a charger. Buy the Honor X9b if you prefer a more modern chipset for smoother multitasking and gaming, and appreciate the convenience of significantly faster 35W charging, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.