The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Moto G32 and Samsung Galaxy A14 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G32 edges out the Galaxy A14 thanks to its significantly faster processor and quicker charging. While the A14 boasts Samsung's brand recognition and potentially a slightly better display, the G32's performance advantage makes it the more appealing option for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 28 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro/depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mineral Grey, Satin Silver, Rose Gold | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | XT2235-2, XT2235-3 | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | ₹ 8,990 | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G32
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- 30W Fast Charging
- Sleek Design
- Clean Android Experience
- Camera could be better
- Potentially less durable build
- Smaller Battery Capacity (vs A14)
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Samsung Brand Recognition
- Larger Display
- Versatile Camera System
- Potentially more durable build
- Slower Processor (Helio G80/Exynos 850)
- 15W Slow Charging
- Samsung's One UI can be bloated
- Performance can be sluggish
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Galaxy A14 generally has a slightly better panel with potentially more accurate colors and better viewing angles. The Moto G32's display is adequate but may not be as vibrant. Resolution is similar, offering a decent viewing experience for both.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A14 typically offers a more versatile camera system with a higher resolution main sensor and potentially better image processing. The Moto G32's camera is decent but may struggle in low-light conditions. Samsung's software often provides more features and modes.
Performance
The Moto G32's Snapdragon 680 chipset is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Galaxy A14's Helio G80 (or Exynos 850). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Moto G32. The A14 can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
Both phones offer decent battery life, easily lasting a full day with moderate usage. However, the Moto G32's 30W charging significantly outperforms the Galaxy A14's 15W charging, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G32 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and fast charging on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a good fit for those who value Samsung's ecosystem, a potentially more durable build, and a larger screen, even if it means sacrificing some speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Motorola Moto G32 has a significantly faster processor, making it the better choice for gaming.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A14 more durable?
The Galaxy A14 is generally perceived to have a more robust build quality, although both phones are primarily made of plastic.
❓ Which phone has a cleaner software experience?
The Moto G32 offers a near-stock Android experience, while the Galaxy A14 runs Samsung's One UI, which includes additional features but can also feel more cluttered.
